This is reintroduction of the recently simplified logic - if positive tt cutoff
occurs return not a tt value but smth between it and beta. Difference is that
instead of static linear combination there we use basically the same formula as
we do in the main search - with the only difference being using tt depth
instead of depth, which makes a lot of sense.
Passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/665b3a34f4a1fd0c208ea870
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 54944 W: 14239 L: 13896 D: 26809
Ptnml(0-2): 151, 6407, 14008, 6760, 146
Passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/665b520011645bd3d3fac341
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 90540 W: 23070 L: 22640 D: 44830
Ptnml(0-2): 39, 9903, 24965, 10315, 48
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/5336
bench 1381237
Basically the same idea as it is for continuation/main history, but it
has some tweaks.
1) it has * 2 multiplier for bonus instead of full/half bonus - for
whatever reason this seems to work better;
2) attempts with this type of big bonuses scaled somewhat poorly (or
were unlucky at longer time controls), but after measuring the fact
that average value of pawn history in LMR after adding this bonuses
increased by substantial number (for multiplier 1,5 it increased by
smth like 400~ from 8192 cap) attempts were made to make default pawn
history negative to compensate it - and version with multiplier 2 and
initial fill value -900 passed.
Passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/66424815f9f4e8fc783cba59
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 115008 W: 30001 L: 29564 D: 55443
Ptnml(0-2): 432, 13629, 28903, 14150, 390
Passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6642f5437134c82f3f7a3ffa
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 56448 W: 14432 L: 14067 D: 27949
Ptnml(0-2): 36, 6268, 15254, 6627, 39
Bench: 1857237
Make it formula more in line with what we use in search - current formula is more or less the one we used years ago for search but since then it was remade, this patch remakes qsearch formula to almost exactly the same as we use in search - with sum of conthist 0, 1 and pawn structure history.
Passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6639c8421343f0cb16716206
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 84992 W: 22414 L: 22019 D: 40559
Ptnml(0-2): 358, 9992, 21440, 10309, 397
Passed LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 119136 W: 30407 L: 29916 D: 58813
Ptnml(0-2): 46, 13192, 32622, 13641, 67
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/5224
Bench: 2138659
Before, one always had to keep track of the bonus one assigns to a history to stop
the stats from overflowing. This is a quality of life improvement. Since this would often go unnoticed during benching.
Passed non-regression bounds:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/65ef2af40ec64f0526c44cbc
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 179232 W: 46513 L: 46450 D: 86269
Ptnml(0-2): 716, 20323, 47452, 20432, 693
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/5116
No functional change
This patch does similar thing to how it's done for
qsearch - in case of fail high adjust result to
lower value. Difference is that it is done only
for non-pv nodes and it's depth dependent - so
lower depth entries will have bigger adjustment
and higher depth entries will have smaller
adjustment.
Passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/65c3c0cbc865510db0283b21
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 112032 W: 29142 L: 28705 D: 54185
Ptnml(0-2): 479, 13152, 28326, 13571, 488
Passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/65c52e62c865510db02855d5
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 132480 W: 33457 L: 32936 D: 66087
Ptnml(0-2): 67, 14697, 36222, 15156, 98
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/5047
Bench: 1168241
Idea from Caissa (https://github.com/Witek902/Caissa) chess engine.
With given pawn structure collect data with how often search result and by how
much it was better / worse than static evalution of position and use it to
adjust static evaluation of positions with given pawn structure. Details:
1. excludes positions with fail highs and moves producing it being a capture;
2. update value is function of not only difference between best value and static
evaluation but also is multiplied by linear function of depth;
3. maximum update value is maximum value of correction history divided by 2;
4. correction history itself is divided by 32 when applied so maximum value of
static evaluation adjustment is 32 internal units.
Passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/658fc7b679aa8af82b955cac
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 128672 W: 32757 L: 32299 D: 63616
Ptnml(0-2): 441, 15241, 32543, 15641, 470
Passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/65903f6979aa8af82b9566f1
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 97422 W: 24626 L: 24178 D: 48618
Ptnml(0-2): 41, 10837, 26527, 11245, 61
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4950
Bench: 1157852
Instead of returning strict fail soft fail high return value between value from
search and beta (somewhat by analogy to futility pruning and probcut).
This seems to be somewhat depth sensitive heuristic which performed much worse
at LTC while performing much better at STC if it is more aggressive, passed
version is the least aggressive one.
Passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/657b06414d789acf40ab1475
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 212352 W: 53900 L: 53315 D: 105137
Ptnml(0-2): 809, 25236, 53520, 25783, 828
Passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/657ce36f393ac02e79120a7c
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 319362 W: 79541 L: 78630 D: 161191
Ptnml(0-2): 202, 35839, 86709, 36708, 223
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4928
Bench: 974739
This patch is a simplification of my recent elo gainer.
Logically the Elo gainer didn't make much sense and this patch simplifies it into smth more logical.
Instead of assigning negative bonuses to all non-first moves that enter PV nodes
we assign positive bonuses in full depth search after LMR only for moves that
will result in a fail high - thus not assigning positive bonuses
for moves that will go to pv search - so doing "almost" the same as we do in master now for them.
Logic differs for some other moves, though, but this removes some lines of code.
Passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/642cf5cf77ff3301150dc5ec
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 409320 W: 109124 L: 109308 D: 190888
Ptnml(0-2): 1149, 45385, 111751, 45251, 1124
Passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/642fe75d20eb941419bde200
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 260336 W: 70280 L: 70303 D: 119753
Ptnml(0-2): 99, 25236, 79528, 25199, 106
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4522
Bench: 4286815
This patch simplifies initialization of statScore to "always set it up to 0" instead of setting it up to 0 two plies deeper.
Reason for why it was done in previous way partially was because of LMR usage of previous statScore which was simplified long time ago so it makes sense to make in more simple there.
Passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/641a86d1db43ab2ba6f7b31d
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 115648 W: 30895 L: 30764 D: 53989
Ptnml(0-2): 368, 12741, 31473, 12876, 366
Passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/641b1c31db43ab2ba6f7d17a
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 175576 W: 47122 L: 47062 D: 81392
Ptnml(0-2): 91, 17077, 53390, 17141, 89
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4460
bench 5081969
in a some of cases movepicker returned some moves more than once which lead
to them being searched more than once. This bug was possible because of how
we use queen promotions - they are generated as a captures but are not
included in position function which checks if move is a capture. Thus if
any refutation (killer or countermove) was a queen promotion it was
searched twice - once as a capture and one as a refutation.
This patch affects various things, namely stats assignments for queen promotions
and other moves if best move is queen promotion,
also some heuristics in search and qsearch.
With this patch every queen promotion is now considered a capture.
After this patch number of found duplicated moves is 0 during normal 13 depth bench run.
Passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/63f77e01e74a12625bcd87d7
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 80920 W: 21455 L: 21289 D: 38176
Ptnml(0-2): 198, 8839, 22241, 8963, 219
Passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/63f7e020e74a12625bcd9a76
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 89712 W: 23674 L: 23533 D: 42505
Ptnml(0-2): 24, 8737, 27202, 8860, 33
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4405
bench 4681731
This patch is a simplification / code normalisation in qsearch.
Adds steps in comments the same way we have in search;
Makes a separate "pruning" stage instead of heuristics randomly being spread over qsearch code;
Reorders pruning heuristics from least taxing ones to more taxing ones;
Removes repeated check for best value not being mated, instead uses 1 check - thus removes some lines of code.
Moves prefetch and move setup after pruning - makes no sense to do them if move will actually get pruned.
Passed non-regression test:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/63dd2c5ff9a50a69252c1413
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 113504 W: 29898 L: 29770 D: 53836
Ptnml(0-2): 287, 11861, 32327, 11991, 286
https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4382
Non-functional change.
Current master prunes all moves with negative SEE values in qsearch.
This patch sets constant negative threshold thus allowing some moves with negative SEE values to be searched.
Value of threshold is completely arbitrary and can be tweaked - also it as function of depth can be tried.
Original idea by author of Alexandria engine.
Passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/63d79a59a67dd929a5564976
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 34864 W: 9392 L: 9086 D: 16386
Ptnml(0-2): 113, 3742, 9429, 4022, 126
Passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/63d8074aa67dd929a5565bc2
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 91616 W: 24532 L: 24126 D: 42958
Ptnml(0-2): 32, 8840, 27662, 9238, 36
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4376
Bench: 4010877
This idea is a mix of koivisto idea of threat history and heuristic that
was simplified some time ago in LMR - decreasing reduction for moves that evade a capture.
Instead of doing so in LMR this patch does it in movepicker - to do this it
calculates squares that are attacked by different piece types and pieces that are located
on this squares and boosts up weight of moves that make this pieces land on a square that is not under threat.
Boost is greater for pieces with bigger material values.
Special thanks to koivisto and seer authors for explaining me ideas behind threat history.
Passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/62406e473b32264b9aa1478b
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 19816 W: 5320 L: 5072 D: 9424
Ptnml(0-2): 86, 2165, 5172, 2385, 100
Passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/62407f2e3b32264b9aa149c8
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 51200 W: 13805 L: 13500 D: 23895
Ptnml(0-2): 44, 5023, 15164, 5322, 47
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3970
bench 7736491
This patch is a result of tuning done by user @candirufish after 150k games.
Since the tuned values were really interesting and touched heuristics
that are known for their non-linear scaling I decided to run limited
games LTC match, even if the STC test was really bad (which was expected).
After seeing the results of the LTC match, I also run a VLTC (very long
time control) SPRTtest, which passed.
The main difference is in extensions: this patch allows much more
singular/double extensions, both in terms of allowing them at lower
depths and with lesser margins.
Failed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/620d66643ec80158c0cd3b46
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 4968 W: 1194 L: 1398 D: 2376
Ptnml(0-2): 47, 633, 1294, 497, 13
Performed well at LTC in a fixed-length match:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/620d66823ec80158c0cd3b4a
ELO: 3.36 +-1.8 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 30000 W: 7966 L: 7676 D: 14358
Ptnml(0-2): 36, 2936, 8755, 3248, 25
Passed VLTC SPRT test:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/620da11a26f5b17ec884f939
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 4400 W: 1326 L: 1127 D: 1947
Ptnml(0-2): 13, 309, 1348, 526, 4
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3937
Bench: 6318903
Most credits for this patch should go to @candirufish.
Based on his big search tuning (1M games at 20+0.1s)
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61fc7a6ed508ec6a1c9f4b7d
with some hand polishing on top of it, which includes :
a) correcting trend sigmoid - for some reason original tuning resulted in it being negative. This heuristic was proven to be worth some elo for years so reversing it sign is probably some random artefact;
b) remove changes to continuation history based pruning - this heuristic historically was really good at providing green STCs and then failing at LTC miserably if we tried to make it more strict, original tuning was done at short time control and thus it became more strict - which doesn't scale to longer time controls;
c) remove changes to improvement - not really indended :).
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6203526e88ae2c84271c2ee2
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 16840 W: 4604 L: 4363 D: 7873
Ptnml(0-2): 82, 1780, 4449, 2033, 76
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/620376e888ae2c84271c35d4
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 17232 W: 4771 L: 4542 D: 7919
Ptnml(0-2): 14, 1655, 5048, 1886, 13
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3926
bench 5030992
This is a reintroduction of an idea that was simplified away approximately 1 year ago.
There are some tweaks to it :
a) exclude promotions;
b) exclude Pv Nodes from it - Pv Nodes logic for captures is really different from non Pv nodes so it makes a lot of sense;
c) use a big grain of capture history - idea is taken from my recent patches in futility pruning.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61bd90f857a0d0f327c373b7
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 86640 W: 22474 L: 22110 D: 42056
Ptnml(0-2): 268, 9732, 22963, 10082, 275
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61be094457a0d0f327c38aa3
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 23240 W: 6079 L: 5838 D: 11323
Ptnml(0-2): 14, 2261, 6824, 2512, 9
https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3864
bench 4493723
This patch is a follow up of previous 2 patches that introduced more reductions for PV nodes with low delta and more pruning for nodes with low delta. Instead of writing separate heuristics now it adjust reductions based on delta / rootDelta - it allows to remove 3 separate adjustements of pruning/LMR in different places and also makes reduction dependence on delta and rootDelta smoother. Also now it works for all pruning heuristics and not just 2.
Passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61ba9b6c57a0d0f327c2d48b
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 79192 W: 20513 L: 20163 D: 38516
Ptnml(0-2): 238, 8900, 21024, 9142, 292
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61baf77557a0d0f327c2eb8e
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 158400 W: 41134 L: 40572 D: 76694
Ptnml(0-2): 101, 16372, 45745, 16828, 154
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3862
bench 4651538
This idea is somewhat similar to extentions in LMR but has a different flavour.
If result of LMR was really good - thus exceeded alpha by some pretty
big given margin, we can extend move after LMR in full depth search with 0 window.
The idea is that this move is probably a fail high with somewhat of a big
probability so extending it makes a lot of sense
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61ad45ea56fcf33bce7d74b7
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 59680 W: 15531 L: 15215 D: 28934
Ptnml(0-2): 193, 6711, 15734, 6991, 211
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61ad9ff356fcf33bce7d8646
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 59104 W: 15321 L: 14992 D: 28791
Ptnml(0-2): 53, 6023, 17065, 6364, 47
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3838
bench 4881329
This patch is a result of refining of tuning vondele did after
new net passed and some hand-made values adjustements - excluding
changes in other pruning heuristics and rounding value of history
divisor to the nearest power of 2.
With this patch futility pruning becomes more aggressive and
history influence on it is doubled again.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61a2c4c1a26505c2278c150d
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 33848 W: 8841 L: 8574 D: 16433
Ptnml(0-2): 100, 3745, 8988, 3970, 121
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61a327ffa26505c2278c26d9
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 22272 W: 5856 L: 5614 D: 10802
Ptnml(0-2): 12, 2230, 6412, 2468, 14
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3814
bench 6302543
This idea is somewhat of a respin of smth we had in futility pruning and that was simplified away - dependence of it not only on static evaluation of position but also on move history heuristics.
Instead of aborting it when they are high there we use fraction of their sum to adjust static eval pruning criteria.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/619bd438c0a4ea18ba95a27d
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 113704 W: 29284 L: 28870 D: 55550
Ptnml(0-2): 357, 12884, 30044, 13122, 445
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/619cb8f0c0a4ea18ba95a334
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 147136 W: 37307 L: 36770 D: 73059
Ptnml(0-2): 107, 15279, 42265, 15804, 113
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3805
bench 6777918
Idea of this patch is the following: in case we already have four moves that
exceeded alpha in the current node, the probability of finding fifth should
be reasonably low. Note that four is completely arbitrary - there could and
probably should be some tweaks, both in tweaking best move count threshold
for more reductions and tweaking how they work - for example making more
reductions with best move count linearly.
passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/615f614783dd501a05b0aee2
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 141816 W: 36056 L: 35686 D: 70074
Ptnml(0-2): 499, 15131, 39273, 15511, 494
passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/615fdff683dd501a05b0af35
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 68536 W: 17221 L: 16891 D: 34424
Ptnml(0-2): 38, 6573, 20725, 6885, 47
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3736
Bench: 6131513
Respin of multi-thread idea that was simplified away recently: basically doing
more reductions with thread count since Lazy SMP naturally widens search. With
drawish book this idea got simplified away but with less drawish book it again
gains elo, maybe trying to reinstall other ideas that were simplified away
previously can be beneficial.
passed STC
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 39736 W: 10205 L: 9986 D: 19545
Ptnml(0-2): 45, 4254, 11064, 4447, 58
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/615750702d02f48db3961b00
passed LTC
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 60352 W: 15530 L: 15218 D: 29604
Ptnml(0-2): 24, 5900, 18016, 6212, 24
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6157d8935488e26ea5eace7f
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3724
Bench 5714575
Idea is to extend some quiet ttMoves if a lot of things indicate that
the transposition table move is going to be a good move:
1) move being a killer - so being the best move in nearby node;
2) reply continuation history is really good.
This is basically saying that move is good "in general" in this position,
that it is a good reply to the opponent move and that it was the best in
this position somewhere in search - so extending it makes a lot of sense.
In general in past year we had a lot of extensions of different types,
maybe there is something more in it :)
passed STC
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 42944 W: 10932 L: 10695 D: 21317
Ptnml(0-2): 141, 4869, 11210, 5116, 136
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/614cca8e7bdc23e77ceb89f0
passed LTC
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 156848 W: 39473 L: 38893 D: 78482
Ptnml(0-2): 125, 16327, 44913, 16961, 98
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/614cf93d7bdc23e77ceb8a13
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3719
Bench: 5714575
This patch introduces extension for captures and promotions. Every capture or
promotion that is not the first move in the list gets extended at PvNodes and
cutNodes. Special thanks to @locutus2 - all my previous attepmts that failed
on this idea were done only for PvNodes - idea to include also cutNodes was
based on his latest passed patch.
STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6134abf325b9b35584838574
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 188920 W: 47754 L: 47304 D: 93862
Ptnml(0-2): 595, 21754, 49344, 22140, 627
LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/613521de25b9b355848385d7
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 8768 W: 2283 L: 2098 D: 4387
Ptnml(0-2): 7, 866, 2452, 1053, 6
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3692
bench: 5564555
The main idea is that illegal moves influencing search or
qsearch obviously can't be any sort of good. The only reason
why initially legality checks for search and qsearch were done
after they actually can influence some heuristics is because
legality check is expensive computationally. Eventually in
search it was moved to the place where it makes sure that
illegal moves can't influence search.
This patch shows that the same can be done for qsearch + it
passed STC with elo-gaining bounds + it removes 3 lines of code
because one no longer needs to increment/decrement movecount
on illegal moves.
passed STC with elo-gaining bounds
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60f20aefd1189bed71812da0
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 61512 W: 4688 L: 4492 D: 52332
Ptnml(0-2): 139, 3730, 22848, 3874, 165
The same version functionally but with moving condition ever earlier
passed LTC with simplification bounds.
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60f292cad1189bed71812de9
LLR: 2.98 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.50,0.50>
Total: 60944 W: 1724 L: 1685 D: 57535
Ptnml(0-2): 11, 1556, 27298, 1597, 10
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3618
bench 4709569
This patch restricts LMR extensions (of non-transposition table moves) from being
used when the transposition table move was extended by two plies via singular
extension. This may serve to limit search explosions in certain positions.
This makes a lot of sense because the precondition for the tt-move to have been
singular extended by two plies is that the result of the alternate search (with
excluded the tt-move) has been a hard fail low: it is natural to later search less
for non tt-moves in this situation.
The current state of depth/extensions/reductions management is getting quite tricky
in our search algo, see https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3546#issuecomment-860174549
for some discussion. Suggestions welcome!
Passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60c3f293457376eb8bcaac8d
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 117984 W: 9698 L: 9430 D: 98856
Ptnml(0-2): 315, 7708, 42703, 7926, 340
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60c46ea5457376eb8bcaacc7
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 11280 W: 401 L: 302 D: 10577
Ptnml(0-2): 2, 271, 4998, 364, 5
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3546
Bench: 4709974
This patch increases lmrDepth threshold for continuation history based pruning in search.
This part of code for a long time was known to be really TC sensitive - decreasing
this threshold easily passed lower time controls but failed badly at LTC,
on the other hand it increase was part of a tuning that resulted
in being negative at STC but was +12 elo at 180+1.8.
After recent simplification of special conditions that sometimes
increase it from 4 to 5 it was logical to overall test at longer
time controls if 5 is better than 4 with deeper searches.
reduces strenght on STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60a3a8bbce8ea25a3ef03c74
ELO: -2.57 +-2.0 (95%) LOS: 0.6%
Total: 20000 W: 1820 L: 1968 D: 16212
Ptnml(0-2): 68, 1582, 6836, 1458, 56
Passed LTC with STC bounds
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60a027395085663412d090ce
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 175256 W: 6774 L: 6548 D: 161934
Ptnml(0-2): 91, 5808, 75604, 6034, 91
Passed VLTC with LTC bounds
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60a2bccce229097940a037a7
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 65736 W: 1224 L: 1092 D: 63420
Ptnml(0-2): 5, 1012, 30706, 1136, 9
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3473
bench 3689330
This patch broadens and simplifies definition of PvNode that is likely to fail low.
New definition can be described as following "If node was already researched
at depth >= current depth and failed low there" which is more logical than the
previous version and takes less space + allows to not recompute it every time during move loop.
Passed simplification STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/609148bf95e7f1852abd2e82
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.50,0.50>
Total: 20128 W: 1865 L: 1751 D: 16512
Ptnml(0-2): 63, 1334, 7165, 1430, 72
Passed simplification LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6091691295e7f1852abd2e8b
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.50,0.50>
Total: 95128 W: 3498 L: 3481 D: 88149
Ptnml(0-2): 41, 2956, 41549, 2981, 37
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3455
Bench: 3933037
