 pb00067andStéphane Nicolet
|
dc5d9bdfee
|
Remove lowPly history
Seems that after pull request #3731 (Capping stat bonus at 2000) this
heuristic is no longer useful.
STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61b8d0e2dffbe89a35815444
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.25,0.25>
Total: 30672 W: 7974 L: 7812 D: 14886
Ptnml(0-2): 106, 3436, 8072, 3634, 88
LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61b8e90cdffbe89a35815a67
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.25,0.25>
Total: 42448 W: 10884 L: 10751 D: 20813
Ptnml(0-2): 23, 4394, 12267, 4507, 33
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3853
bench: 4474950
|
2021-12-17 18:37:41 +01:00 |
|
 pb00067andJoost VandeVondele
|
282644f141
|
Remove depth dependence and use same limit (2000) as stat_bonus
STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/619df59dc0a4ea18ba95a424
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.25,0.25>
Total: 83728 W: 21329 L: 21242 D: 41157
Ptnml(0-2): 297, 9669, 21847, 9752, 299
LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/619e64d7c0a4ea18ba95a475
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.25,0.25>
Total: 79888 W: 20238 L: 20155 D: 39495
Ptnml(0-2): 57, 8391, 22980, 8444, 73
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3806
bench: 6792010
|
2021-12-01 17:55:23 +01:00 |
|
 pb00067andJoost VandeVondele
|
760b7462bc
|
Simplify lowply-history scoring logic
STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60eee559d1189bed71812b16
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.50,0.50>
Total: 33976 W: 2523 L: 2431 D: 29022
Ptnml(0-2): 66, 2030, 12730, 2070, 92
LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60eefa12d1189bed71812b24
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.50,0.50>
Total: 107240 W: 3053 L: 3046 D: 101141
Ptnml(0-2): 56, 2668, 48154, 2697, 45
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3616
bench: 5199177
|
2021-07-23 18:53:03 +02:00 |
|
 pb00067andJoost VandeVondele
|
f4986f4596
|
SEE: simplify stm variable initialization
Pull #3458 removed the only usage of pos.see_ge() moving pieces that
don't belong to the side to move, so we can simplify this, adding an assert.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3607
No functional change
|
2021-07-13 17:31:15 +02:00 |
|
 pb00067andJoost VandeVondele
|
1f3b5b8b54
|
Simplify condition for assigning static-eval based bonus
for quiet move ordering and simplify bonus formula.
Due to clamping the bonus to relative low values the impact on high
depths is minimal, thus the restriction to low depths seems not
necessary.
Also the condition of movecount in previous node seems to be not
determinant.
Passed STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-1.25,0.25}
Total: 14600 W: 1424 L: 1323 D: 11853
Ptnml(0-2): 55, 1033, 5020, 1140, 52
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5fd67b381ac16912018885ec
Passed LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.75,0.25}
Total: 85008 W: 3218 L: 3206 D: 78584
Ptnml(0-2): 49, 2840, 36700, 2880, 35
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5fd6af041ac16912018885f8
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3265
bench: 4524994
|
2020-12-18 21:19:46 +01:00 |
|
 pb00067andJoost VandeVondele
|
16adcb5374
|
Merge static history into main history,
thus simplifying and reducing the memory footprint.
I believe using static diff for better move ordering is more suited for
low depths, so restrict writing to low depths.
Todo: probably the condition for writing can be simplified
LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.75,0.25}
Total: 18752 W: 768 L: 705 D: 17279
Ptnml(0-2): 7, 635, 8034, 688, 12
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5fd631791ac169120188859e
STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-1.25,0.25}
Total: 36504 W: 3380 L: 3313 D: 29811
Ptnml(0-2): 116, 2667, 12645, 2682, 142
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5fd5ed861ac1691201888569
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3262
bench: 4018036
|
2020-12-14 07:48:48 +01:00 |
|
 pb00067andJoost VandeVondele
|
15e190e942
|
Use lowply-history also on low depths
STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ed75078f29b40b0fc95a8b9
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 73928 W: 14301 L: 14005 D: 45622
Ptnml(0-2): 1243, 8572, 17096, 8752, 1301
LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ed895e0f29b40b0fc95a976
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 154848 W: 19684 L: 19074 D: 116090
Ptnml(0-2): 1048, 14108, 46627, 14468, 1173
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2718
bench: 4582693
|
2020-06-06 16:18:42 +02:00 |
|
 pb00067andJoost VandeVondele
|
bb5589b829
|
continuation histories when in check
If in check, don't write to continuation histories ss-4, ss-6.
Adding inCheck to the stack was needed, and might be useful for
future patches.
Passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e9ee24acaaff5d60a50b812
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 61774 W: 11725 L: 11449 D: 38600
Ptnml(0-2): 971, 7211, 14322, 7337, 1046
Passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e9eecb7caaff5d60a50b831
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 250822 W: 32067 L: 31179 D: 187576
Ptnml(0-2): 1745, 23126, 74824, 23928, 1788
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2645
bench: 4808463
|
2020-04-22 08:48:01 +02:00 |
|
 pb00067andJoost VandeVondele
|
ec2002c594
|
Simplify futility pruning parent node
only continuation histories seem needed for this purpose.
STC:
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e6b88dfe42a5c3b3ca2e4ab
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-1.50,0.50}
Total: 113356 W: 21725 L: 21696 D: 69935
Ptnml(0-2): 1999, 13255, 26163, 13240, 2021
LTC:
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e6babbfe42a5c3b3ca2e4c2
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-1.50,0.50}
Total: 22164 W: 2917 L: 2821 D: 16426
Ptnml(0-2): 173, 2040, 6548, 2160, 161
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2583
bench: 4839496
|
2020-03-14 16:30:17 +01:00 |
|