Give an additional penalty of S(20, 10) for any doubled pawn if none of
the opponent's pawns is facing any of our
- pawns or
- pawn attacks;
that means, each of their pawns can push at least one square without
being captured.
This ignores their non-pawns pieces and attacks.
One possible justification: Their pawns' ability to push freely provides
options to react to our threats by changing their pawn structure. Our
doubled pawns however will likely lead to an exploitable weakness, even
if the pawn structure is not yet fixed.
Note that the notion of "their pawns not being fixed" is symmetric for
both players: If all of their pawns can push freely so can ours. All
pawns being freely pushable might just be an early-game-indicator.
However, it can trigger during endgame pawns races, where doubled pawns
are especially hindering, too.
LTC
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.25}
Total: 134976 W: 17964 L: 17415 D: 99597
Ptnml(0-2): 998, 12702, 39619, 13091, 1078
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ffdd5316019e097de3ef281
STC
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.25,1.25}
Total: 35640 W: 7219 L: 6904 D: 21517
Ptnml(0-2): 645, 4096, 8084, 4289, 706
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ffda4a16019e097de3ef265
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3302
Bench: 4363873
+-----------------+
| . . . . . . . . | All files are closed. Some files are
| . . . . . o o . | more valuable for rooks, because
| . . . . o . . o | they might open in the future.
| . . . o x . . x |
| o . o x . x x . |
| x o x . . . . . | x our pawns
| . x . . . . . . | o their pawns
| . . . . . . . . | ^ rooks are scored higher on these files
+-----------------+
^ ^
Files containing none of our own pawns are open or half-open (otherwise
they are closed). Rooks on (half-)open files recieve a bonus for the
future potential to act along all ranks.
This commit refines the (relative) penalty of rooks on closed files.
Files that contain one of our blocked pawns are considered less likely
to open in the future; rooks on these files are now penalized stronger.
This bonus does not generally correlate with mobility. If the condition
is sufficiently refined in the future, it may be beneficial to adjust or
override mobility scores in some cases.
LTC
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.25}
Total: 494384 W: 71565 L: 70231 D: 352588
Ptnml(0-2): 3907, 48050, 142118, 49036, 4081
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5fb9312e67cbf42301d6afb9
LTC (non-regression w/ book noob_3moves.epd)
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.75,0.25}
Total: 208520 W: 27044 L: 26937 D: 154539
Ptnml(0-2): 1557, 19850, 61391, 19853, 1609
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5fc01ced67cbf42301d6b3df
STC
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.25,1.25}
Total: 98392 W: 20269 L: 19868 D: 58255
Ptnml(0-2): 1804, 11297, 22589, 11706, 1800
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5fb7f88a67cbf42301d6af10
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3242
Bench: 3682630
Allow any pawn in front of a minor piece to replace the pawn protection
requirement for outposts.
+-------+ +-------+
| . . o | | o . . | o Their pawns
| . o x | | o . . | x Our pawns
| o N . | | x o B | N,B New (reachable) outpost
| . . . | | . _ . | _ Reachable square behind a pawn
+-------+ +-------+
N outpost B reaches
outpost
We want outposts to be secured by pawns against major pieces. If
a minor is shielded by any pawn from above, it is rarely at the same
time protected by our pawn attacks from below. However, the pawn shield
in itself offers some degree of protection.
A pawn shield will now suffice to replace the pawn protection for the
outpost (and reachable outpost) bonus.
This effect stacks with the existing "minor behind pawn" bonus.
STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f2bcd14b3ebe5cbfee85b2c
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 27248 W: 5353 L: 5119 D: 16776
Ptnml(0-2): 462, 3174, 6185, 3274, 529
LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f2bfef5b3ebe5cbfee85b5a
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 99432 W: 12580 L: 12130 D: 74722
Ptnml(0-2): 696, 8903, 30049, 9391, 677
Closes#2935
Bench: 4143673
+-------+
| o . . | o their pawns
| x . . | x our pawns
| . x . | <- Can sacrifice to create passer?
+-------+
yes
1 2 3 4 5
+-------+ +-------+ +-------+ +-------+ +-------+
| o . . | | o r . | | o r . | | o . b | | o . b | lowercase: theirs
| x b . | | x . . | | x . R | | x . R | | x . . | uppercase: ours
| . x . | | . x . | | . x . | | . x . | | . x B |
+-------+ +-------+ +-------+ +-------+ +-------+
no no yes no yes
The value of our top pawn depends on our ability to advance our bottom
pawn, levering their blocker. Previously, this pawn configuration was
always scored as passer (although a blocked one).
Add requirements for the square s above our (possibly) sacrificed pawn:
- s must not be occupied by them (1).
- If they attack s (2), we must attack s (3).
- If they attack s with a minor (4), we must attack s with a minor (5).
The attack from their blocker is ignored because it is inherent in the
structure; we are ok with sacrificing our bottom pawn.
LTC
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 37030 W: 4962 L: 4682 D: 27386
Ptnml(0-2): 266, 3445, 10863, 3625, 316
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e92a2b4be6ede5b954bf239
STC
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 40874 W: 8066 L: 7813 D: 24995
Ptnml(0-2): 706, 4753, 9324, 4890, 764
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e922199af0a0143109dc90e
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2624
Bench: 4828294
