This idea is a mix of koivisto idea of threat history and heuristic that
was simplified some time ago in LMR - decreasing reduction for moves that evade a capture.
Instead of doing so in LMR this patch does it in movepicker - to do this it
calculates squares that are attacked by different piece types and pieces that are located
on this squares and boosts up weight of moves that make this pieces land on a square that is not under threat.
Boost is greater for pieces with bigger material values.
Special thanks to koivisto and seer authors for explaining me ideas behind threat history.
Passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/62406e473b32264b9aa1478b
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 19816 W: 5320 L: 5072 D: 9424
Ptnml(0-2): 86, 2165, 5172, 2385, 100
Passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/62407f2e3b32264b9aa149c8
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 51200 W: 13805 L: 13500 D: 23895
Ptnml(0-2): 44, 5023, 15164, 5322, 47
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3970
bench 7736491
This patch is a result of tuning done by user @candirufish after 150k games.
Since the tuned values were really interesting and touched heuristics
that are known for their non-linear scaling I decided to run limited
games LTC match, even if the STC test was really bad (which was expected).
After seeing the results of the LTC match, I also run a VLTC (very long
time control) SPRTtest, which passed.
The main difference is in extensions: this patch allows much more
singular/double extensions, both in terms of allowing them at lower
depths and with lesser margins.
Failed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/620d66643ec80158c0cd3b46
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 4968 W: 1194 L: 1398 D: 2376
Ptnml(0-2): 47, 633, 1294, 497, 13
Performed well at LTC in a fixed-length match:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/620d66823ec80158c0cd3b4a
ELO: 3.36 +-1.8 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 30000 W: 7966 L: 7676 D: 14358
Ptnml(0-2): 36, 2936, 8755, 3248, 25
Passed VLTC SPRT test:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/620da11a26f5b17ec884f939
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 4400 W: 1326 L: 1127 D: 1947
Ptnml(0-2): 13, 309, 1348, 526, 4
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3937
Bench: 6318903
Most credits for this patch should go to @candirufish.
Based on his big search tuning (1M games at 20+0.1s)
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61fc7a6ed508ec6a1c9f4b7d
with some hand polishing on top of it, which includes :
a) correcting trend sigmoid - for some reason original tuning resulted in it being negative. This heuristic was proven to be worth some elo for years so reversing it sign is probably some random artefact;
b) remove changes to continuation history based pruning - this heuristic historically was really good at providing green STCs and then failing at LTC miserably if we tried to make it more strict, original tuning was done at short time control and thus it became more strict - which doesn't scale to longer time controls;
c) remove changes to improvement - not really indended :).
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6203526e88ae2c84271c2ee2
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 16840 W: 4604 L: 4363 D: 7873
Ptnml(0-2): 82, 1780, 4449, 2033, 76
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/620376e888ae2c84271c35d4
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 17232 W: 4771 L: 4542 D: 7919
Ptnml(0-2): 14, 1655, 5048, 1886, 13
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3926
bench 5030992
This is a reintroduction of an idea that was simplified away approximately 1 year ago.
There are some tweaks to it :
a) exclude promotions;
b) exclude Pv Nodes from it - Pv Nodes logic for captures is really different from non Pv nodes so it makes a lot of sense;
c) use a big grain of capture history - idea is taken from my recent patches in futility pruning.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61bd90f857a0d0f327c373b7
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 86640 W: 22474 L: 22110 D: 42056
Ptnml(0-2): 268, 9732, 22963, 10082, 275
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61be094457a0d0f327c38aa3
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 23240 W: 6079 L: 5838 D: 11323
Ptnml(0-2): 14, 2261, 6824, 2512, 9
https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3864
bench 4493723
This patch is a follow up of previous 2 patches that introduced more reductions for PV nodes with low delta and more pruning for nodes with low delta. Instead of writing separate heuristics now it adjust reductions based on delta / rootDelta - it allows to remove 3 separate adjustements of pruning/LMR in different places and also makes reduction dependence on delta and rootDelta smoother. Also now it works for all pruning heuristics and not just 2.
Passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61ba9b6c57a0d0f327c2d48b
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 79192 W: 20513 L: 20163 D: 38516
Ptnml(0-2): 238, 8900, 21024, 9142, 292
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61baf77557a0d0f327c2eb8e
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 158400 W: 41134 L: 40572 D: 76694
Ptnml(0-2): 101, 16372, 45745, 16828, 154
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3862
bench 4651538
This idea is somewhat similar to extentions in LMR but has a different flavour.
If result of LMR was really good - thus exceeded alpha by some pretty
big given margin, we can extend move after LMR in full depth search with 0 window.
The idea is that this move is probably a fail high with somewhat of a big
probability so extending it makes a lot of sense
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61ad45ea56fcf33bce7d74b7
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 59680 W: 15531 L: 15215 D: 28934
Ptnml(0-2): 193, 6711, 15734, 6991, 211
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61ad9ff356fcf33bce7d8646
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 59104 W: 15321 L: 14992 D: 28791
Ptnml(0-2): 53, 6023, 17065, 6364, 47
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3838
bench 4881329
This patch is a result of refining of tuning vondele did after
new net passed and some hand-made values adjustements - excluding
changes in other pruning heuristics and rounding value of history
divisor to the nearest power of 2.
With this patch futility pruning becomes more aggressive and
history influence on it is doubled again.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61a2c4c1a26505c2278c150d
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 33848 W: 8841 L: 8574 D: 16433
Ptnml(0-2): 100, 3745, 8988, 3970, 121
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61a327ffa26505c2278c26d9
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 22272 W: 5856 L: 5614 D: 10802
Ptnml(0-2): 12, 2230, 6412, 2468, 14
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3814
bench 6302543
This idea is somewhat of a respin of smth we had in futility pruning and that was simplified away - dependence of it not only on static evaluation of position but also on move history heuristics.
Instead of aborting it when they are high there we use fraction of their sum to adjust static eval pruning criteria.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/619bd438c0a4ea18ba95a27d
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 113704 W: 29284 L: 28870 D: 55550
Ptnml(0-2): 357, 12884, 30044, 13122, 445
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/619cb8f0c0a4ea18ba95a334
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 147136 W: 37307 L: 36770 D: 73059
Ptnml(0-2): 107, 15279, 42265, 15804, 113
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3805
bench 6777918
Idea of this patch is the following: in case we already have four moves that
exceeded alpha in the current node, the probability of finding fifth should
be reasonably low. Note that four is completely arbitrary - there could and
probably should be some tweaks, both in tweaking best move count threshold
for more reductions and tweaking how they work - for example making more
reductions with best move count linearly.
passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/615f614783dd501a05b0aee2
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 141816 W: 36056 L: 35686 D: 70074
Ptnml(0-2): 499, 15131, 39273, 15511, 494
passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/615fdff683dd501a05b0af35
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 68536 W: 17221 L: 16891 D: 34424
Ptnml(0-2): 38, 6573, 20725, 6885, 47
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3736
Bench: 6131513
Respin of multi-thread idea that was simplified away recently: basically doing
more reductions with thread count since Lazy SMP naturally widens search. With
drawish book this idea got simplified away but with less drawish book it again
gains elo, maybe trying to reinstall other ideas that were simplified away
previously can be beneficial.
passed STC
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 39736 W: 10205 L: 9986 D: 19545
Ptnml(0-2): 45, 4254, 11064, 4447, 58
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/615750702d02f48db3961b00
passed LTC
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 60352 W: 15530 L: 15218 D: 29604
Ptnml(0-2): 24, 5900, 18016, 6212, 24
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6157d8935488e26ea5eace7f
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3724
Bench 5714575
Idea is to extend some quiet ttMoves if a lot of things indicate that
the transposition table move is going to be a good move:
1) move being a killer - so being the best move in nearby node;
2) reply continuation history is really good.
This is basically saying that move is good "in general" in this position,
that it is a good reply to the opponent move and that it was the best in
this position somewhere in search - so extending it makes a lot of sense.
In general in past year we had a lot of extensions of different types,
maybe there is something more in it :)
passed STC
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 42944 W: 10932 L: 10695 D: 21317
Ptnml(0-2): 141, 4869, 11210, 5116, 136
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/614cca8e7bdc23e77ceb89f0
passed LTC
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 156848 W: 39473 L: 38893 D: 78482
Ptnml(0-2): 125, 16327, 44913, 16961, 98
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/614cf93d7bdc23e77ceb8a13
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3719
Bench: 5714575
This patch introduces extension for captures and promotions. Every capture or
promotion that is not the first move in the list gets extended at PvNodes and
cutNodes. Special thanks to @locutus2 - all my previous attepmts that failed
on this idea were done only for PvNodes - idea to include also cutNodes was
based on his latest passed patch.
STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6134abf325b9b35584838574
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 188920 W: 47754 L: 47304 D: 93862
Ptnml(0-2): 595, 21754, 49344, 22140, 627
LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/613521de25b9b355848385d7
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 8768 W: 2283 L: 2098 D: 4387
Ptnml(0-2): 7, 866, 2452, 1053, 6
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3692
bench: 5564555
The main idea is that illegal moves influencing search or
qsearch obviously can't be any sort of good. The only reason
why initially legality checks for search and qsearch were done
after they actually can influence some heuristics is because
legality check is expensive computationally. Eventually in
search it was moved to the place where it makes sure that
illegal moves can't influence search.
This patch shows that the same can be done for qsearch + it
passed STC with elo-gaining bounds + it removes 3 lines of code
because one no longer needs to increment/decrement movecount
on illegal moves.
passed STC with elo-gaining bounds
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60f20aefd1189bed71812da0
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 61512 W: 4688 L: 4492 D: 52332
Ptnml(0-2): 139, 3730, 22848, 3874, 165
The same version functionally but with moving condition ever earlier
passed LTC with simplification bounds.
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60f292cad1189bed71812de9
LLR: 2.98 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.50,0.50>
Total: 60944 W: 1724 L: 1685 D: 57535
Ptnml(0-2): 11, 1556, 27298, 1597, 10
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3618
bench 4709569
This patch restricts LMR extensions (of non-transposition table moves) from being
used when the transposition table move was extended by two plies via singular
extension. This may serve to limit search explosions in certain positions.
This makes a lot of sense because the precondition for the tt-move to have been
singular extended by two plies is that the result of the alternate search (with
excluded the tt-move) has been a hard fail low: it is natural to later search less
for non tt-moves in this situation.
The current state of depth/extensions/reductions management is getting quite tricky
in our search algo, see https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3546#issuecomment-860174549
for some discussion. Suggestions welcome!
Passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60c3f293457376eb8bcaac8d
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 117984 W: 9698 L: 9430 D: 98856
Ptnml(0-2): 315, 7708, 42703, 7926, 340
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60c46ea5457376eb8bcaacc7
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 11280 W: 401 L: 302 D: 10577
Ptnml(0-2): 2, 271, 4998, 364, 5
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3546
Bench: 4709974
This patch increases lmrDepth threshold for continuation history based pruning in search.
This part of code for a long time was known to be really TC sensitive - decreasing
this threshold easily passed lower time controls but failed badly at LTC,
on the other hand it increase was part of a tuning that resulted
in being negative at STC but was +12 elo at 180+1.8.
After recent simplification of special conditions that sometimes
increase it from 4 to 5 it was logical to overall test at longer
time controls if 5 is better than 4 with deeper searches.
reduces strenght on STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60a3a8bbce8ea25a3ef03c74
ELO: -2.57 +-2.0 (95%) LOS: 0.6%
Total: 20000 W: 1820 L: 1968 D: 16212
Ptnml(0-2): 68, 1582, 6836, 1458, 56
Passed LTC with STC bounds
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60a027395085663412d090ce
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 175256 W: 6774 L: 6548 D: 161934
Ptnml(0-2): 91, 5808, 75604, 6034, 91
Passed VLTC with LTC bounds
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60a2bccce229097940a037a7
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 65736 W: 1224 L: 1092 D: 63420
Ptnml(0-2): 5, 1012, 30706, 1136, 9
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3473
bench 3689330
This patch broadens and simplifies definition of PvNode that is likely to fail low.
New definition can be described as following "If node was already researched
at depth >= current depth and failed low there" which is more logical than the
previous version and takes less space + allows to not recompute it every time during move loop.
Passed simplification STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/609148bf95e7f1852abd2e82
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.50,0.50>
Total: 20128 W: 1865 L: 1751 D: 16512
Ptnml(0-2): 63, 1334, 7165, 1430, 72
Passed simplification LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6091691295e7f1852abd2e8b
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.50,0.50>
Total: 95128 W: 3498 L: 3481 D: 88149
Ptnml(0-2): 41, 2956, 41549, 2981, 37
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3455
Bench: 3933037
our net currently is not trained on FRC games, and so doesn't know about the important pattern of a bishop that is cornered in FRC.
This patch introduces a term we have in the classical evaluation for this case, and adds it to the NNUE eval.
Since fishtest doesn't support FRC right now, the patch was tested locally at STC conditions,
starting from the book of FRC starting positions.
Score of master vs patch: 993 - 2226 - 6781 [0.438] 10000
Which corresponds to approximately 40 Elo
The patch passes non-regression testing for traditional chess (where it adds one branch).
passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/604fa2532433018de7a38b67
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-1.25,0.25}
Total: 30560 W: 2701 L: 2636 D: 25223
Ptnml(0-2): 88, 2056, 10921, 2133, 82
passed STC also in an earlier version:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/604f61282433018de7a38b4d
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3398
No functional change
The idea of this patch can be described as follows: if we are in check
and the transposition table move is a capture that returns a value
far above beta, we can assume that the opponent just blundered a piece
by giving check, and we return the transposition table value. This is
similar to the usual probCut logic for quiet moves, but with a different
threshold.
Passed STC
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.25,1.25}
Total: 33440 W: 3056 L: 2891 D: 27493
Ptnml(0-2): 110, 2338, 11672, 2477, 123
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/602cd1087f517a561bc49bda
Passed LTC
LLR: 2.98 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.25}
Total: 10072 W: 401 L: 309 D: 9362
Ptnml(0-2): 2, 288, 4365, 378, 3
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/602ceea57f517a561bc49bf0
The committed version has an additional fix to never return unproven wins
in the tablebase range or the mate range. This fix passed tests for non-
regression at STC and LTC:
STC:
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) {-1.25,0.25}
Total: 26240 W: 2354 L: 2280 D: 21606
Ptnml(0-2): 85, 1763, 9372, 1793, 107
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/602d86a87f517a561bc49c7a
LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.75,0.25}
Total: 35304 W: 1299 L: 1256 D: 32749
Ptnml(0-2): 14, 1095, 15395, 1130, 18
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/602d98d17f517a561bc49c83
Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3362
Bench: 3830215
Do not decrease reduction at pv-nodes which are likely to fail low.
The idea of this patch can be described as following: during the search, if a node
on the principal variation was re-searched in non-pv search and this re-search got
a value which was much lower than alpha, then we can assume that this pv-node is
likely to fail low again, and we can reduce more aggressively at this node.
Passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6023a5fa7f517a561bc49638
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.25,1.25}
Total: 70288 W: 6443 L: 6223 D: 57622
Ptnml(0-2): 239, 5022, 24436, 5174, 273
Passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6023f2617f517a561bc49661
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.25}
Total: 105656 W: 4048 L: 3748 D: 97860
Ptnml(0-2): 67, 3312, 45761, 3630, 58
Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3349
Bench: 3766422
In a recent patch we added comparing capture history to a number for LMR of captures.
Calling it via thisThread-> is not needed since capture history was already declared by this time -
so removing makes code slightly shorter and easier to follow.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3297
No functional change.
The idea of this patch is pretty simple - we already do more reductions
for non-PV and root nodes in case of stable best move for depth > 10.
This patch makes us do so if root depth if > 10 instead, which
is logical since best move changes (thus instability of it) is
counted at root, so it makes a lot of sense to use depth of the root.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5fd643271ac16912018885c5
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.25,1.25}
Total: 13232 W: 1308 L: 1169 D: 10755
Ptnml(0-2): 39, 935, 4535, 1062, 45
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5fd68db11ac16912018885f0
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.25}
Total: 14024 W: 565 L: 463 D: 12996
Ptnml(0-2): 3, 423, 6062, 517, 7
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3263
Bench: 4050630
The idea of this patch can be described as following: we update static
history stats based on comparison of the static evaluations of the
position before and after the move. If the move increases static evaluation
it's assigned positive bonus, if it decreases static evaluation
it's assigned negative bonus. These stats are used in movepicker
to sort quiet moves.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5fca4c0842a050a89f02cd66
LLR: 3.00 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.25,1.25}
Total: 78152 W: 7409 L: 7171 D: 63572
Ptnml(0-2): 303, 5695, 26873, 5871, 334
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5fca6be442a050a89f02cd75
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.25}
Total: 40240 W: 1602 L: 1441 D: 37197
Ptnml(0-2): 19, 1306, 17305, 1475, 15
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3253
bench 3845156
Idea of this patch can be described as following - in case we have consecutive fail highs and we reach late enough moves at root node probability of remaining quiet moves being able to produce even bigger value than moves that produced previous cutoff (so ones that should be high in move ordering but now they fail to produce beta cutoff because we actually reached high move count) should be quiet small so we can reduce them more.
passed STC
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.25,1.25}
Total: 53392 W: 5681 L: 5474 D: 42237
Ptnml(0-2): 214, 4104, 17894, 4229, 255
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f88501adcdad978fe8c527e
passed LTC
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.25}
Total: 59136 W: 2773 L: 2564 D: 53799
Ptnml(0-2): 30, 2117, 25078, 2300, 43
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f884dbfdcdad978fe8c527a
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3184
Bench: 4066972
Idea is that division by fraction of 2 is slightly faster than by other numbers so parameters are adjusted in a way that division in null move pruning depth reduction features dividing by 256 instead of dividing by 213.
Other than this patch is almost non-functional - difference starts to exist by depth 133.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f70dd943b22d6afa50693c5
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.25,1.25}
Total: 57048 W: 6616 L: 6392 D: 44040
Ptnml(0-2): 304, 4583, 18531, 4797, 309
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f7180db3b22d6afa506941f
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.25}
Total: 45960 W: 2419 L: 2229 D: 41312
Ptnml(0-2): 43, 1779, 19137, 1987, 34
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3159
bench 3789924
The idea of this patch is that positions are usually more complex and hard to evaluate even if there are more pawns.
This patch adjusts NNUE threshold usage depending on number of pawns in position, if pawn count is <3 we use the
classical evaluation more often, for pawn count = 3 patch the is non-functional,
with pawn count > 3 NNUE evaluation is used more often.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f2f02d09081672066536b1f
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 36520 W: 5011 L: 4823 D: 26686
Ptnml(0-2): 299, 3482, 10548, 3594, 337
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f2f4c329081672066536b5c
LLR: 2.98 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 39272 W: 2630 L: 2433 D: 34209
Ptnml(0-2): 53, 2066, 15218, 2229, 70
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2960
bench 4084753
This patch increases LMRdepth threshold for futility pruning at parent nodes so it can apply more often.
With radical change to evaluation approach it seems that search is really far from optimal state, especially it parts that use static evaluation of position.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f2da75661e3b6af64881fd0
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 8744 W: 1305 L: 1156 D: 6283
Ptnml(0-2): 75, 789, 2500, 928, 80
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f2dcb2a61e3b6af64881ff3
LLR: 2.98 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 17728 W: 1256 L: 1117 D: 15355
Ptnml(0-2): 22, 961, 6774, 1070, 37
Bench: 4067325
Probcut is a heuristic that wasn't changed a lot in past years,
all attempts to change it using information / writing info to transposition table failed.
This patch has a number of differences that can be summarized as follows:
* For TT write/read we use depth - 3. Because probcut search is depth - 4 but we actually do the move prior to it so effectively we do depth - 3 search;
* In any case of depth of eval from transposition table being >= depth - 3 we either produce cutoff or refuse to even do probcut search, this is allowing us to write info of probcut to transposition table because we know that we wouldn't be overwriting some deeper data with our depth - 3 search - this is an important aspect of this patch;
* For some not really known reason this patch completely ignores tte->bound() - which was the case for previous patch that made probcut interact with TT, maybe 2) is the reason, although it's unproven.
A first version of this patch passed STC and LTC
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f05908a59f6f03532894613
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 95776 W: 18300 L: 17973 D: 59503
Ptnml(0-2): 1646, 10944, 22377, 11279, 1642
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f06b54059f6f035328946bb
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 57128 W: 7266 L: 6938 D: 42924
Ptnml(0-2): 372, 5163, 17217, 5389, 423
However, an additional bugfix was needed to avoid checking a condition on ttMove if was not available. This passed non-regression bounds on top of the first version:
at STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f080e5059f6f03532894766
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-1.50,0.50}
Total: 14096 W: 2800 L: 2628 D: 8668
Ptnml(0-2): 225, 1620, 3238, 1688, 277
at LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f0836a559f6f0353289479c
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-1.50,0.50}
Total: 25352 W: 3228 L: 3139 D: 18985
Ptnml(0-2): 175, 2350, 7549, 2415, 187
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2804
Bench 4540940
The idea of this patch is that if capture can be described as
"less valuable piece takes more valuable piece" it's not really correct
to add only piece value of captured piece to static evaluation
since there can be more threats in other places and opponent can't really
do much but recapture our capturing piece which leaves us space for
more captures thus winning more material and increasing static eval.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ef0167b122d6514328d760f
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 24736 W: 4838 L: 4607 D: 15291
Ptnml(0-2): 438, 2812, 5648, 3021, 449
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ef073bc122d6514328d7693
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 46152 W: 5865 L: 5567 D: 34720
Ptnml(0-2): 312, 4160, 13886, 4354, 364
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2761
bench 4789930
The idea of this patch is that if rooks are not directly attacking the opponent king,
they can support king attacks staying behind pawns or minor pieces and be really
deadly if position slightly opens up at enemy king ring ranks. Loosely based on
some stockfish games where it underestimated attacks on it king when enemy has one
or two rooks supporting pawn pushes towards it king.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ecb093680f2c838b96550f9
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 53672 W: 10535 L: 10265 D: 32872
Ptnml(0-2): 952, 6210, 12258, 6448, 968
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ecb639f80f2c838b9655117
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 62424 W: 8094 L: 7748 D: 46582
Ptnml(0-2): 426, 5734, 18565, 6042, 445
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2700
Bench: 4663220
This patch increases number of nodes where we produce multicut cutoffs.
The idea is that if our ttMove failed to produce a singular extension
but ttValue is greater than beta we can afford to do one more reduced search
near beta excluding ttMove to see if it will produce a fail high -
and if it does so produce muticut by analogy to existing logic.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e9a162b5b664cdba0ce6e28
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 58238 W: 11192 L: 10917 D: 36129
Ptnml(0-2): 1007, 6704, 13442, 6939, 1027
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e9a1e845b664cdba0ce7411
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 137852 W: 17460 L: 16899 D: 103493
Ptnml(0-2): 916, 12610, 41383, 13031, 986
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2640
bench 4881443
This idea is loosely based on xoroshiro idea about raisedBeta and ttmoves.
If our ttmove have low enough ttvalue and is deep enough (deeper than our probcut depth) it makes little sense to try probcut moves, since the ttMove already more or less failed to produce one according to transposition table.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e9673ddc2718dee3c822920
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 72148 W: 14038 L: 13741 D: 44369
Ptnml(0-2): 1274, 8326, 16615, 8547, 1312
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e96b378c2718dee3c8229bf
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 89054 W: 11418 L: 10996 D: 66640
Ptnml(0-2): 623, 8113, 26643, 8515, 633
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2632
bench 4952731
This patch refines the recently introduced interaction between
the space bonus and the number of blocked pawns in a position.
* pawns count as blocked also if their push square is attacked by 2 enemy pawns;
* overall dependence is stronger as well as offset;
* bonus increase is capped at 9 blocked pawns in position;
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e94560663d105aebbab243d
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 29500 W: 5842 L: 5603 D: 18055
Ptnml(0-2): 504, 3443, 6677, 3562, 564
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e95b383c2aaa99f75d1a14d
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 63504 W: 8329 L: 7974 D: 47201
Ptnml(0-2): 492, 5848, 18720, 6197, 495
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2631
bench 4956028
The idea behind this patch is that if static eval is really bad so capturing of current piece on spot will still produce a position with an eval much lower than alpha then our best chance is to create some kind of king attack. So captures without check are mostly worse than captures with check and can be reduced more.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e8514b44411759d9d098543
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 46196 W: 9039 L: 8781 D: 28376
Ptnml(0-2): 750, 5412, 10628, 5446, 862
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e8530134411759d9d09854c
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 23462 W: 3228 L: 2988 D: 17246
Ptnml(0-2): 186, 2125, 6849, 2405, 166
close https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2612
bench 4742598
This patch greatly increases the endgame penalty for having a trapped rook.
Idea was a result of witnessing Stockfish losing some games at CCCC exchanging
pieces in the position with a trapped rook which directly lead to a lost endgame.
This patch should partially fix such behavior making this penalty high even in
deep endgames.
Passed STC
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e279d7cc3b97aa0d75bc1c4
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-1.00,3.00}
Total: 8528 W: 1706 L: 1588 D: 5234
Ptnml(0-2): 133, 957, 1985, 1024, 159
Passed LTC
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e27aee4c3b97aa0d75bc1e1
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {0.00,2.00}
Total: 88713 W: 11520 L: 11130 D: 66063
Ptnml(0-2): 646, 8170, 26342, 8492, 676
Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2510
Bench: 4964462
----------------------
Comment by Malcolm Campbell:
Congrats! I think this might be a common pattern - scores that seem to mainly apply
to the midgame are often better with a similar (or at least fairly big) endgame value
as well. Maybe there are others eval parameters we can tweak like this...
Based on recent improvement of futility pruning by @locutus2 : we lower
the futility margin to apply it for more nodes but as a compensation
we also lower the history threshold to apply it to less nodes. Further
work in tweaking constants can always be done - numbers are guessed
"by hand" and are not results of some tuning, maybe there is some more
Elo to squeeze from this part of code.
Passed STC
LLR: 2.98 (-2.94,2.94) {-1.00,3.00}
Total: 15300 W: 3081 L: 2936 D: 9283
Ptnml(0-2): 260, 1816, 3382, 1900, 290
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e18da3b27dab692fcf9a158
Passed LTC
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {0.00,2.00}
Total: 108670 W: 14509 L: 14070 D: 80091
Ptnml(0-2): 813, 10259, 31736, 10665, 831
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e18fc9627dab692fcf9a180
Bench: 4643972
This patch excludes blockers for king from mobility area. It was tried a couple
of times by now but now it passed. Performance is not enormously good but this
patch makes a lot of sence - blockers for king can't really move until king moves
(in most cases) so logic behind it is the same as behind excluding king square
from mobility area.
STC
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5dec388651219d7befdc76be
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-1.50,4.50]
Total: 6155 W: 1428 L: 1300 D: 3427
LTC
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5dec4a3151219d7befdc76d3
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,3.50]
Total: 120800 W: 19636 L: 19134 D: 82030
Bench: 5173081
This patch simplifies latest @MJZ1977 elo gainer. Seems like PvNode check in
condition of last capture extension is not needed. Note - even if this is a
simplification it actually causes this extension to be applied more often, thus
strengthening effect of @MJZ1977's patch.
passed STC
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5deb9a3eb7bdefd50db28d0e
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 80244 W: 17421 L: 17414 D: 45409
passed LTC
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5deba860b7bdefd50db28d11
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 21506 W: 3565 L: 3446 D: 14495
Bench: 5097036
This patch implements what we have been trying for quite some time -
dependance of kingdanger on balance of attackers and defenders of king
flank, to avoid overestimate attacking power if the opponent has enough
defenders of king position. We already have some form of it in bishop
and knight defenders - this is further work in this direction.
What to do based on this?
1) constant 4 is arbitrary, maybe it is not optimal
2) maybe we can use quadratic formula as in kingflankattack
3) simplification into alrealy existing terms is always a possibility :)
4) overall kingdanger tuning always can be done.
passed STC:
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5dcf40560ebc590256325f30
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-1.50,4.50]
Total: 26298 W: 5819 L: 5632 D: 14847
passed LTC:
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5dcfa5760ebc590256326464
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,3.50]
Total: 30600 W: 5042 L: 4784 D: 20774
Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2415
Bench: 4496847
This patch finally introduces something that was tried for years: midgame score
dependance on complexity of position. More precisely, if the position is very
simplified and the complexity measure calculated in the initiative() function
is inferior to -50 by an amount d, then we add this value d to the midgame score.
One example of play of this patch will be (again!) 4 vs 3 etc same flank endgames
where sides have a lot of non-pawn material: 4 vs 3 draw mostly remains the same
draw even if we add a lot of equal material to both sides.
STC run was stopped after 200k games (and not converging):
LLR: -1.75 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 200319 W: 44197 L: 43310 D: 112812
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5d7cfdb10ebc5902d386572c
passed LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,3.50]
Total: 41051 W: 6858 L: 6570 D: 27623
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5d7d14680ebc5902d3866196
This is the first and not really precise version, a lot of other stuff can be
tried on top of it (separate complexity for middlegame, some more terms, even
simple retuning of values).
Bench: 4248476
This patch greatly scales down complexity of endgames when the
following conditions are all true together:
- pawns are all on one flank
- stronger side king is not outflanking weaker side
- no passed pawns are present
This should improve stockfish evaluation of obvious draws 4 vs 3, 3 vs 2
and 2 vs 1 pawns in rook/queen/knight/bishop single flank endgames where
strong side can not make progress.
passed STC
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 15843 W: 3601 L: 3359 D: 8883
passed LTC
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,3.50]
Total: 121275 W: 20107 L: 19597 D: 81571
Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2298
Bench: 3954190
==========================
How to continue from there?
a) This could be a powerful idea for refining some parts of the evaluation
function, a bit like when we try quadratics or other equations to emphasize
certain situations (xoto10).
b) Some other combinaison values for this bonus can be done further, or
overall retuning of weight and offset while keeping the formula simple.
Current master code made sence when we had 2 types of bonuses for protected path to queen. But it was simplified so we have only one bonus now and code was never cleaned.
This non-functional simplification removes useless defendedsquares bitboard and removes one bitboard assignment (defendedSquares &= attackedBy[Us][ALL_PIECES] + defendedSquares & blockSq becomes just attackedBy[Us][ALL_PIECES] & blockSq also we never assign defendedSquares = squaresToQueen because we don't need it).
So should be small non-functional speedup.
Passed simplification SPRT.
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5d2966ef0ebc5925cf0d7659
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 23319 W: 5152 L: 5034 D: 13133
bench 3361902
