In case tte->depth() is far lower the current depth
and we are in a PV node.
Almost 45% of researches give a different ttMove !
After 999 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +174 =694 -131 +15 ELO !!!!!!!
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Do not search immediately at full depth, but try a second
chance at lower depth. This is a feature that should scale
well because become important at high depths where we have
big reductions and also big savings in avoiding a costly
full depth search.
After 942 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +158 =645 -139 +7 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
The index at 0 was reserved for no-pieces
information. But we don't need that.
This is a prerequisite for next patch.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
They are both 64 bits unsigned integer, but it
is correct to use the proper type.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
After 999 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +148 =712 -139 +3 ELO
The added complexity doesn't seems to pay off and could
even scale worst with longer TC. So revert.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
The tested square comes from a bitboard anded with
pos.pieces_of_color(Us), so assert is useless.
Another nitpick report by Marek Kwiatkowski ;-)
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
One of the most nitpicking patches I have ever seen.
Of course almost no functional change, but added just
becasue we are very pedantic ;-)
Spotted by Marek Kwiatkowski
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It was erroneusly reversed. Bug from Glaurung times.
Probably a full re-tuning is needed anyhow.
Spotted and fixed by Ralph Stoesser.
After 999 games almost no change, but modified anyway
for documentation reasons.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Increase threats score according to the number of
threats and to the side to move.
Constants have been balanced after ~34k iterations.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It does not seem to increase anything even with a QUAD,
so revert.
After 1000 games with a QUAD
Mod - Orig: 500 - 497 (+1 elo)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
When compiling with MSVC we don't use the Makefile
so tweak a bit the Makefile to allow to let prefetch
in by default so that it works under Windows.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
No gain in the worst case of 2 threads, but also no
loss and good potential for QUAD or OCTAL machines.
After 922 games at 1+0 with 2 threads
Mod vs Orig +143 =533 -143 +0 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We already tested few lines before with:
assert(pos.pawn_is_passed(Us, s));
Spotted by Marek Kwiatkowski.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Does not help and it slows downs a bit because it
is not cheap to get the possible discovered checks
out of a position.
After 997 games at 1+0
Mod vs orig +153 =692 -152 +0 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
There is no reason for that since tr cannot become negative.
Spotted by Ralph Stoesser.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Final values for threath tuning (after ~30k iterations)
Verified to be equivalent with tuning branch.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This is a more standard naming (see chessprogramming wiki)
and is more stick to what table is and not what is used for.
Code in pawns.cpp is a bit more readable now, at least for me ;-)
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Avoid a double bitcount in test for candidate passed
pawn when we don't have any supporting pawn.
Also use outpost_mask() instead of build it up on
the fly.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Pass the color for which the square is to be
considered weak, not the opposite.
It is more natural and intuitive in this way.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Function split() doesn't need to return a value, also
remove useless 'master' field.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It is redundant with splitPoint->slaves[].
Also move slaves[MAX_THREADS] among the shared data in
SplitPoint definition as it should have been already.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Small twekas to make the two searches as similar as
possible.
Also removed an useless setting of mateKiller in sp_search()
No functional change (tested with FakeSplit)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We don't need to comment/uncomment code, just
set FakeSplit bool to true to enable faked split.
Also reintroduced some asserts and cleaned up a bit.
Tested that with FakeSplit = true we have reproducible
finger printing even in SMP.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It was broken on Windows 64bit with MSVC and possibly
on other platforms, so revert to old proven one.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Remove a lot of complex, obscure and useless code.
After 999 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +162 =673 -164 -1 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We don't need to evaluate the position if it
is already cached in TT. We already do this
in non-PV case.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This is what actually is.
A standard naming convention suggests to name a variable
with someting resembling _what_ the variable is and not
_how_ the variable is used. This normally results
in easier to read code.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
A bigger "safety" value is actually a bigger
threat for the king, so it is a bigger "danger"
With this renaming "Cowardice" and "Aggressiveness"
UCI parameters become easier to understand.
It is also easier to understand why the once "safety"
value (that is a "danger") is subtracted from evaluation
instead of being added.
No functional change.
Use a Weights[] array instead of named variables to
store evaluation weights.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Master thread returns from idle_loop() when sp->cpus == 0,
but cpus is decremented by slave threads under sp->lock,
so it could happen that we return in split(), where we release
the split point, with sp->lock still held.
This patch guarantees that sp->lock is released when returning
to split().
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
The idea here is that if we cut-off after a stand pat the
already exsisting TT entry was not usable with current
beta, so overwrite anyway.
After 999 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +173 =665 -161 + 4 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Almost no change and simplifies a bit the code.
After 961 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +156 =650 -146 +4 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Re-save the same TT entry if value is usable and allow
us to cut-off, it means that entry is valuable and
we want to keep it fresh updating the 'generation'
parameter up to the current value.
Patch suggested by J. Wesley Cleveland and better
clarified by Miguel A. Ballicora.
After 999 games at 1+0 64MB hash size
Mod vs Orig +167 =677 -155 +4 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
In this case we avoid to name the 'black' version of the
endgame function but use a vector indexed by color instead.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Because exit_threads() references the global object TM, we
need to call the function when still inside main(), otherwise,
due to undefined global object initialization and destruction
we could end up with referencing an already destroyed object.
Actually this should not happen because Application singleton
is initialized _only_ after all the other globals due to how
Application::initialize() is defined, but this is very tricky
C++ and not easy to follow, even for me ;-)
Also rearranged a bit main() code flow.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Moved evaluation of unstoppable pawns out of
evauation of passed pawns because event frequency is
much lower. Added evaluate_unstoppable_pawns() that
is called very seldom and contains all the unstoppable
pawn logic.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Should be a very minor change, but there is a small
functional change because futility_margin() is used in more
places then in the pruning formula.
After 999 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +167 =678 -154 +5 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Also fix dimension of UnpairedPawnsTable[] to accomodate the
case in which we have 8 unpaired pawns, i.e. only one side has
pawns, the other side has no pawns.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
The idea is to reduce the score if we have many
pawns opposing an enemy pawn so that the draw
possibility increases.
Just introduced the logic, but no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
A pawn is candidate to be passed if doesn't have enemy pawns
in just front of him, not also behind !
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Absolutely no useful at all, just code obfuscation so
use real definition instead.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It will be used to lookup squares in front of
a given square. Same concept of PassedPawnMask[]
and OutpostMask[].
Also small tweaks in bitboard.h
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Now with:
stockfish bench 128 1 5 default perft
it is possible to get perft 5 results of each position and
the first 3 positions correspond to the well known test
position in:
http://chessprogramming.wikispaces.com/Perft+Results
This allow to quickly check for perft consistency running
the 'bench' command.
No functional change but signature has changed because
bench default positions 2 and 3 have changed.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Revert all the patches that introduced the change and
more or less fixed the zugzwang issue.
There is a gain against last current version and we
can remove a lot of code.
After 979 games at 1+0 on my QUAD
Mod vs Orig +152 =688 -139 +5 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Real search is considered of higher quality then null
search one.
This allows to fix the zugzwang issue with a minimal
impact on ELO.
Zugzwang verified on position:
8/7P/8/8/K2b4/p7/1k6/1B6 b - -
After 999 games at 1+0 on my QUAD
Mod vs Orig(94bb196) +168 =657 -174 -2 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Is a boolean option that when set allows Stockfish
to select the best book move across the possible ones.
Feature requested by Salvo Spitaleri.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This is the world's fussiest compiler with +w1
Warnings reported by Richard Lloyd.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Add an UCI option "Zugzwang detection" OFF by default that
enables correct detection of zugzwang.
This is just to let 1.7.1 be 100% compatible with 1.7 and
should be removed after release.
Verified 100% functional equivalent to 1.7
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It fails in test position:
8/7P/8/8/K2b4/p7/1k6/1B6 b - -
Not clear why but we revert because it fixes the issue.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
In this case use a normal VALUE_TYPE_LOWER TT type instead of
VALUE_TYPE_NS_LO. This allow us to TT cut-off in a bit more nodes.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This patch fixes an issue with zugzwang well explained by Tord:
"Assume that a zugzwang position occurs at iteration N,
at a search depth d, with d < 6*OnePly. The null move search
fails high, and no verification search is done, because the
depth is too small. The position gets stored in the transposition
table with a good score and a depth of d.
Now, consider what happens when the same position occurs at iteration
N+1, this time with a depth of d+OnePly (i.e. one ply deeper than at
the previous iteration). Once again, the null move search fails
high. The point is that the verification search will also fail high,
because of an instant transposition table cutoff caused by the value
stored in the TT during the previous iteration."
With this patch we simply do not allow TT cutoffs at the root node
of a null move verification search if the TT value was found by a
null search.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Add VALUE_TYPE_NS_LO to enum ValueType and use it when
saving in TT a value from a null search.
Currently no action is performed, the next patch will enable
the new type.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Reported warning is:
warning #2514-D: pointless comparison of unsigned
integer with a negative constant
Spotted by Richard Lloyd.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Under gcc we have:
warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
strict-aliasing rules
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Use full depth, not reduced one. This allows
to avoid to do a null search when in the same
position and at the same or bigger depth the
null search failed high.
A very small increase, if any.
After 963 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig: +158 =657 -147 +4 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
In this form it is even more evident we have some
issue there to be fixed sooner then later....
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Marco Costalba