Official release version of Stockfish 15
Bench: 8129754
---
A new major release of Stockfish is now available at https://stockfishchess.org
Stockfish 15 continues to push the boundaries of chess, providing unrivalled
analysis and playing strength. In our testing, Stockfish 15 is ahead of
Stockfish 14 by 36 Elo points and wins nine times more game pairs than it
loses[1].
Improvements to the engine have made it possible for Stockfish to end up
victorious in tournaments at all sorts of time controls ranging from bullet to
classical and even at Fischer random chess[2]. At CCC, Stockfish won all of
the latest tournaments: CCC 16 Bullet, Blitz and Rapid, CCC 960 championship,
and the CCC 17 Rapid. At TCEC, Stockfish won the Season 21, Cup 9, FRC 4 and
in the current Season 22 superfinal, at the time of writing, has won 16 game
pairs and not yet lost a single one.
This progress is the result of a dedicated team of developers that comes up
with new ideas and improvements. For Stockfish 15, we tested nearly 13000
different changes and retained the best 200. These include the fourth
generation of our NNUE network architecture, as well as various search
improvements. To perform these tests, contributors provide CPU time for
testing, and in the last year, they have collectively played roughly a
billion chess games. In the last few years, our distributed testing
framework, Fishtest, has been operated superbly and has been developed and
improved extensively. This work by Pasquale Pigazzini, Tom Vijlbrief, Michel
Van den Bergh, and various other developers[3] is an essential part of the
success of the Stockfish project.
Indeed, the Stockfish project builds on a thriving community of enthusiasts
to offer a free and open-source chess engine that is robust, widely
available, and very strong. We invite our chess fans to join the Fishtest
testing framework and programmers to contribute to the project[4].
The Stockfish team
[1] https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/625d156dff677a888877d1be
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockfish_(chess)#Competition_results
[3] https://github.com/glinscott/fishtest/blob/master/AUTHORS
[4] https://stockfishchess.org/get-involved/
This patch chooses the delta value (which skews the nnue evaluation between positional and materialistic)
depending on the material: If the material is low, delta will be higher and the evaluation is shifted
to the positional value. If the material is high, the evaluation will be shifted to the psqt value.
I don't think slightly negative values of delta should be a concern.
Passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/62418513b3b383e86185766f
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 28808 W: 7832 L: 7564 D: 13412
Ptnml(0-2): 147, 3186, 7505, 3384, 182
Passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/62419137b3b383e861857842
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 58632 W: 15776 L: 15450 D: 27406
Ptnml(0-2): 42, 5889, 17149, 6173, 63
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3971
Bench: 7588855
This idea is a mix of koivisto idea of threat history and heuristic that
was simplified some time ago in LMR - decreasing reduction for moves that evade a capture.
Instead of doing so in LMR this patch does it in movepicker - to do this it
calculates squares that are attacked by different piece types and pieces that are located
on this squares and boosts up weight of moves that make this pieces land on a square that is not under threat.
Boost is greater for pieces with bigger material values.
Special thanks to koivisto and seer authors for explaining me ideas behind threat history.
Passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/62406e473b32264b9aa1478b
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 19816 W: 5320 L: 5072 D: 9424
Ptnml(0-2): 86, 2165, 5172, 2385, 100
Passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/62407f2e3b32264b9aa149c8
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 51200 W: 13805 L: 13500 D: 23895
Ptnml(0-2): 44, 5023, 15164, 5322, 47
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3970
bench 7736491
Via the ttPv flag an implicit tree of current and former PV nodes is maintained. In addition this tree is grown or shrinked at the leafs dependant on the search results. But now the shrinking step has been removed.
As the frequency of ttPv nodes decreases with depth the shown scaling behavior (STC barely passed but LTC scales well) of the tests was expected.
STC:
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.25,0.25>
Total: 270408 W: 71593 L: 71785 D: 127030
Ptnml(0-2): 1339, 31024, 70630, 30912, 1299
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/622fbf9dc9e950cbfc2376d6
LTC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.25,0.25>
Total: 34368 W: 9135 L: 8992 D: 16241
Ptnml(0-2): 28, 3423, 10135, 3574, 24
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/62305257c9e950cbfc238964
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3963
Bench: 7044203
This commit generalizes the feature transform to use vec_t macros
that are architecture defined instead of using a seperate code path for each one.
It should make some old architectures (MMX, including improvements by Fanael) faster
and make further such improvements easier in the future.
Includes some corrections to CI for mingw.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3955
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3928
No functional change
- set the variable only for the required tests to keep simple the yml file
- use NDK 21.x until will be fixed the Stockfish static build problem
with NDK 23.x
- set the test for armv7, armv7-neon, armv8 builds:
- use armv7a-linux-androideabi21-clang++ compiler for armv7 armv7-neon
- enforce a static build
- silence the Warning for the unused compilation flag "-pie" with
the static build, otherwise the Github workflow stops
- use qemu to bench the build and get the signature
Many thanks to @pschneider1968 that made all the hard work with NDK :)
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3924
No functional change
This patch is a result of tuning done by user @candirufish after 150k games.
Since the tuned values were really interesting and touched heuristics
that are known for their non-linear scaling I decided to run limited
games LTC match, even if the STC test was really bad (which was expected).
After seeing the results of the LTC match, I also run a VLTC (very long
time control) SPRTtest, which passed.
The main difference is in extensions: this patch allows much more
singular/double extensions, both in terms of allowing them at lower
depths and with lesser margins.
Failed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/620d66643ec80158c0cd3b46
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 4968 W: 1194 L: 1398 D: 2376
Ptnml(0-2): 47, 633, 1294, 497, 13
Performed well at LTC in a fixed-length match:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/620d66823ec80158c0cd3b4a
ELO: 3.36 +-1.8 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 30000 W: 7966 L: 7676 D: 14358
Ptnml(0-2): 36, 2936, 8755, 3248, 25
Passed VLTC SPRT test:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/620da11a26f5b17ec884f939
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 4400 W: 1326 L: 1127 D: 1947
Ptnml(0-2): 13, 309, 1348, 526, 4
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3937
Bench: 6318903
Architecture:
The diagram of the "SFNNv4" architecture:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8037982/153455685-cbe3a038-e158-4481-844d-9d5fccf5c33a.png
The most important architectural changes are the following:
* 1024x2 [activated] neurons are pairwise, elementwise multiplied (not quite pairwise due to implementation details, see diagram), which introduces a non-linearity that exhibits similar benefits to previously tested sigmoid activation (quantmoid4), while being slightly faster.
* The following layer has therefore 2x less inputs, which we compensate by having 2 more outputs. It is possible that reducing the number of outputs might be beneficial (as we had it as low as 8 before). The layer is now 1024->16.
* The 16 outputs are split into 15 and 1. The 1-wide output is added to the network output (after some necessary scaling due to quantization differences). The 15-wide is activated and follows the usual path through a set of linear layers. The additional 1-wide output is at least neutral, but has shown a slightly positive trend in training compared to networks without it (all 16 outputs through the usual path), and allows possibly an additional stage of lazy evaluation to be introduced in the future.
Additionally, the inference code was rewritten and no longer uses a recursive implementation. This was necessitated by the splitting of the 16-wide intermediate result into two, which was impossible to do with the old implementation with ugly hacks. This is hopefully overall for the better.
First session:
The first session was training a network from scratch (random initialization). The exact trainer used was slightly different (older) from the one used in the second session, but it should not have a measurable effect. The purpose of this session is to establish a strong network base for the second session. Small deviations in strength do not harm the learnability in the second session.
The training was done using the following command:
python3 train.py \
/home/sopel/nnue/nnue-pytorch-training/data/nodes5000pv2_UHO.binpack \
/home/sopel/nnue/nnue-pytorch-training/data/nodes5000pv2_UHO.binpack \
--gpus "$3," \
--threads 4 \
--num-workers 4 \
--batch-size 16384 \
--progress_bar_refresh_rate 20 \
--random-fen-skipping 3 \
--features=HalfKAv2_hm^ \
--lambda=1.0 \
--gamma=0.992 \
--lr=8.75e-4 \
--max_epochs=400 \
--default_root_dir ../nnue-pytorch-training/experiment_$1/run_$2
Every 20th net was saved and its playing strength measured against some baseline at 25k nodes per move with pure NNUE evaluation (modified binary). The exact setup is not important as long as it's consistent. The purpose is to sift good candidates from bad ones.
The dataset can be found https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UQdZN_LWQ265spwTBwDKo0t1WjSJKvWY/view
Second session:
The second training session was done starting from the best network (as determined by strength testing) from the first session. It is important that it's resumed from a .pt model and NOT a .ckpt model. The conversion can be performed directly using serialize.py
The LR schedule was modified to use gamma=0.995 instead of gamma=0.992 and LR=4.375e-4 instead of LR=8.75e-4 to flatten the LR curve and allow for longer training. The training was then running for 800 epochs instead of 400 (though it's possibly mostly noise after around epoch 600).
The training was done using the following command:
The training was done using the following command:
python3 train.py \
/data/sopel/nnue/nnue-pytorch-training/data/T60T70wIsRightFarseerT60T74T75T76.binpack \
/data/sopel/nnue/nnue-pytorch-training/data/T60T70wIsRightFarseerT60T74T75T76.binpack \
--gpus "$3," \
--threads 4 \
--num-workers 4 \
--batch-size 16384 \
--progress_bar_refresh_rate 20 \
--random-fen-skipping 3 \
--features=HalfKAv2_hm^ \
--lambda=1.0 \
--gamma=0.995 \
--lr=4.375e-4 \
--max_epochs=800 \
--resume-from-model /data/sopel/nnue/nnue-pytorch-training/data/exp295/nn-epoch399.pt \
--default_root_dir ../nnue-pytorch-training/experiment_$1/run_$run_id
In particular note that we now use lambda=1.0 instead of lambda=0.8 (previous nets), because tests show that WDL-skipping introduced by vondele performs better with lambda=1.0. Nets were being saved every 20th epoch. In total 16 runs were made with these settings and the best nets chosen according to playing strength at 25k nodes per move with pure NNUE evaluation - these are the 4 nets that have been put on fishtest.
The dataset can be found either at ftp://ftp.chessdb.cn/pub/sopel/data_sf/T60T70wIsRightFarseerT60T74T75T76.binpack in its entirety (download might be painfully slow because hosted in China) or can be assembled in the following way:
Get the https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/blob/5640ad48ae5881223b868362c1cbeb042947f7b4/script/interleave_binpacks.py script.
Download T60T70wIsRightFarseer.binpack https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_sQoWBl31WAxNXma2v45004CIVltytP8/view
Download farseerT74.binpack http://trainingdata.farseer.org/T74-May13-End.7z
Download farseerT75.binpack http://trainingdata.farseer.org/T75-June3rd-End.7z
Download farseerT76.binpack http://trainingdata.farseer.org/T76-Nov10th-End.7z
Run python3 interleave_binpacks.py T60T70wIsRightFarseer.binpack farseerT74.binpack farseerT75.binpack farseerT76.binpack T60T70wIsRightFarseerT60T74T75T76.binpack
Tests:
STC: https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6203fb85d71106ed12a407b7
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 16952 W: 4775 L: 4521 D: 7656
Ptnml(0-2): 133, 1818, 4318, 2076, 131
LTC: https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/62041e68d71106ed12a40e85
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 14944 W: 4138 L: 3907 D: 6899
Ptnml(0-2): 21, 1499, 4202, 1728, 22
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3927
Bench: 4919707
Most credits for this patch should go to @candirufish.
Based on his big search tuning (1M games at 20+0.1s)
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61fc7a6ed508ec6a1c9f4b7d
with some hand polishing on top of it, which includes :
a) correcting trend sigmoid - for some reason original tuning resulted in it being negative. This heuristic was proven to be worth some elo for years so reversing it sign is probably some random artefact;
b) remove changes to continuation history based pruning - this heuristic historically was really good at providing green STCs and then failing at LTC miserably if we tried to make it more strict, original tuning was done at short time control and thus it became more strict - which doesn't scale to longer time controls;
c) remove changes to improvement - not really indended :).
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6203526e88ae2c84271c2ee2
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 16840 W: 4604 L: 4363 D: 7873
Ptnml(0-2): 82, 1780, 4449, 2033, 76
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/620376e888ae2c84271c35d4
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 17232 W: 4771 L: 4542 D: 7919
Ptnml(0-2): 14, 1655, 5048, 1886, 13
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3926
bench 5030992
have maximal compatibility on legacy target arch, now supporting AMD Athlon
The old behavior can anyway be selected by the user if needed, for example
make -j profile-build ARCH=x86-32 sse=yes
fixes#3904
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3918
No functional change
For cross-compiling to Android on windows, the Makefile needs some tweaks.
Tested with Android NDK 23.1.7779620 and 21.4.7075529, using
Windows 10 with clean MSYS2 environment (i.e. no MINGW/GCC/Clang
toolchain in PATH) and Fedora 35, with build target:
build ARCH=armv8 COMP=ndk
The resulting binary runs fine inside Droidfish on my Samsung
Galaxy Note20 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Tab S7+
Other builds tested to exclude regressions: MINGW64/Clang64 build
on Windows; MINGW64 cross build, native Clang and GCC builds on Fedora.
wiki docs https://github.com/glinscott/fishtest/wiki/Cross-compiling-Stockfish-for-Android-on-Windows-and-Linux
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3901
No functional change
A Windows Native Build (WNB) can be done:
- on Windows, using a recent mingw-w64 g++/clang compiler
distributed by msys2, cygwin and others
- on Linux, using mingw-w64 g++ to cross compile
Improvements:
- check for a WNB in a proper way and set a variable to simplify the code
- set the proper EXE for a WNB
- use the proper name for the mingw-w64 clang compiler
- use the static linking for a WNB
- use wine to make a PGO cross compile on Linux (also with Intel SDE)
- enable the LTO build for mingw-w64 g++ compiler
- set `lto=auto` to use the make's job server, if available, or otherwise
to fall back to autodetection of the number of CPU threads
- clean up all the temporary LTO files saved in the local directory
Tested on:
- msys2 MINGW64 (g++), UCRT64 (g++), MINGW32 (g++), CLANG64 (clang)
environments
- cygwin mingw-w64 g++
- Ubuntu 18.04 & 21.10 mingw-w64 PGO cross compile (also with Intel SDE)
closes#3891
No functional change
This updates estimates from 2yr ago #2401, and adds missing terms.
All tests run at 10+0.1 (STC), 20000 games, error bars +- 1.8 Elo, book 8moves_v3.png.
A table of Elo values with the links to the corresponding tests can be found at the PR
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3868
Non-functional Change
This is a reintroduction of an idea that was simplified away approximately 1 year ago.
There are some tweaks to it :
a) exclude promotions;
b) exclude Pv Nodes from it - Pv Nodes logic for captures is really different from non Pv nodes so it makes a lot of sense;
c) use a big grain of capture history - idea is taken from my recent patches in futility pruning.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61bd90f857a0d0f327c373b7
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 86640 W: 22474 L: 22110 D: 42056
Ptnml(0-2): 268, 9732, 22963, 10082, 275
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61be094457a0d0f327c38aa3
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 23240 W: 6079 L: 5838 D: 11323
Ptnml(0-2): 14, 2261, 6824, 2512, 9
https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3864
bench 4493723
This patch is a follow up of previous 2 patches that introduced more reductions for PV nodes with low delta and more pruning for nodes with low delta. Instead of writing separate heuristics now it adjust reductions based on delta / rootDelta - it allows to remove 3 separate adjustements of pruning/LMR in different places and also makes reduction dependence on delta and rootDelta smoother. Also now it works for all pruning heuristics and not just 2.
Passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61ba9b6c57a0d0f327c2d48b
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 79192 W: 20513 L: 20163 D: 38516
Ptnml(0-2): 238, 8900, 21024, 9142, 292
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61baf77557a0d0f327c2eb8e
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 158400 W: 41134 L: 40572 D: 76694
Ptnml(0-2): 101, 16372, 45745, 16828, 154
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3862
bench 4651538
This idea is somewhat similar to extentions in LMR but has a different flavour.
If result of LMR was really good - thus exceeded alpha by some pretty
big given margin, we can extend move after LMR in full depth search with 0 window.
The idea is that this move is probably a fail high with somewhat of a big
probability so extending it makes a lot of sense
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61ad45ea56fcf33bce7d74b7
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 59680 W: 15531 L: 15215 D: 28934
Ptnml(0-2): 193, 6711, 15734, 6991, 211
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61ad9ff356fcf33bce7d8646
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 59104 W: 15321 L: 14992 D: 28791
Ptnml(0-2): 53, 6023, 17065, 6364, 47
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3838
bench 4881329
This patch optimizes the NEON implementation in two ways.
The activation layer after the feature transformer is rewritten to make it easier for the compiler to see through dependencies and unroll. This in itself is a minimal, but a positive improvement. Other architectures could benefit from this too in the future. This is not an algorithmic change.
The affine transform for large matrices (first layer after FT) on NEON now utilizes the same optimized code path as >=SSSE3, which makes the memory accesses more sequential and makes better use of the available registers, which allows for code that has longer dependency chains.
Benchmarks from Redshift#161, profile-build with apple clang
george@Georges-MacBook-Air nets % ./stockfish-b82d93 bench 2>&1 | tail -4 (current master)
===========================
Total time (ms) : 2167
Nodes searched : 4667742
Nodes/second : 2154011
george@Georges-MacBook-Air nets % ./stockfish-7377b8 bench 2>&1 | tail -4 (this patch)
===========================
Total time (ms) : 1842
Nodes searched : 4667742
Nodes/second : 2534061
This is a solid 18% improvement overall, larger in a bench with NNUE-only, not mixed.
Improvement is also observed on armv7-neon (Raspberry Pi, and older phones), around 5% speedup.
No changes for architectures other than NEON.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3837
No functional changes.
Initialize continuation history with a slighlty negative value -71 instead of zero.
The idea is, because the most history entries will be later negative anyway, to shift
the starting values a little bit in the "correct" direction. Of course the effect of
initialization dimishes with greater depth so I had the apprehension that the LTC test
would be difficult to pass, but it passed.
STC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 34520 W: 9076 L: 8803 D: 16641
Ptnml(0-2): 136, 3837, 9047, 4098, 142
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61aa52e39e8855bba1a3776b
LTC:
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 75568 W: 19620 L: 19254 D: 36694
Ptnml(0-2): 44, 7773, 21796, 8115, 56
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61aa87d39e8855bba1a383a5
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3834
Bench: 4674029
In their infinite wisdom, Intel axed AVX512 from Alder Lake
chips (well, not entirely, but we kind of want to use the Gracemont
cores for chess!) but still added VNNI support.
Confusingly enough, this is not the same as VNNI256 support.
This adds a specific AVX-VNNI target that will use this AVX-VNNI
mode, by prefixing the VNNI instructions with the appropriate VEX
prefix, and avoiding AVX512 usage.
This is about 1% faster on P cores:
Result of 20 runs
==================
base (./clang-bmi2 ) = 3306337 +/- 7519
test (./clang-vnni ) = 3344226 +/- 7388
diff = +37889 +/- 4153
speedup = +0.0115
P(speedup > 0) = 1.0000
But a nice 3% faster on E cores:
Result of 20 runs
==================
base (./clang-bmi2 ) = 1938054 +/- 28257
test (./clang-vnni ) = 1994606 +/- 31756
diff = +56552 +/- 3735
speedup = +0.0292
P(speedup > 0) = 1.0000
This was measured on Clang 13. GCC 11.2 appears to generate
worse code for Alder Lake, though the speedup on the E cores
is similar.
It is possible to run the engine specifically on the P or E using binding,
for example in linux it is possible to use (for an 8 P + 8 E setup like i9-12900K):
taskset -c 0-15 ./stockfish
taskset -c 16-23 ./stockfish
where the first call binds to the P-cores and the second to the E-cores.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3824
No functional change
This patch is a result of refining of tuning vondele did after
new net passed and some hand-made values adjustements - excluding
changes in other pruning heuristics and rounding value of history
divisor to the nearest power of 2.
With this patch futility pruning becomes more aggressive and
history influence on it is doubled again.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61a2c4c1a26505c2278c150d
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 33848 W: 8841 L: 8574 D: 16433
Ptnml(0-2): 100, 3745, 8988, 3970, 121
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61a327ffa26505c2278c26d9
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 22272 W: 5856 L: 5614 D: 10802
Ptnml(0-2): 12, 2230, 6412, 2468, 14
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3814
bench 6302543
This idea is somewhat of a respin of smth we had in futility pruning and that was simplified away - dependence of it not only on static evaluation of position but also on move history heuristics.
Instead of aborting it when they are high there we use fraction of their sum to adjust static eval pruning criteria.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/619bd438c0a4ea18ba95a27d
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 113704 W: 29284 L: 28870 D: 55550
Ptnml(0-2): 357, 12884, 30044, 13122, 445
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/619cb8f0c0a4ea18ba95a334
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 147136 W: 37307 L: 36770 D: 73059
Ptnml(0-2): 107, 15279, 42265, 15804, 113
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3805
bench 6777918
retire msvc support and corresponding CI. No active development happens on msvc,
and build is much slower or wrong.
gcc (mingw) is our toolchain of choice also on windows, and the latter is tested.
No functional change
Current master implements a scaling of the raw NNUE output value with a formula
equivalent to 'eval = alpha * NNUE_output', where the scale factor alpha varies
between 1.8 (for early middle game) and 0.9 (for pure endgames). This feature
allows Stockfish to keep material on the board when she thinks she has the advantage,
and to seek exchanges and simplifications when she thinks she has to defend.
This patch slightly offsets the turning point between these two strategies, by adding
to Stockfish's evaluation a small "optimism" value before actually doing the scaling.
The effect is that SF will play a little bit more risky, trying to keep the tension a
little bit longer when she is defending, and keeping even more material on the board
when she has an advantage.
We note that this patch is similar in spirit to the old "Contempt" idea we used to have
in classical Stockfish, but this implementation differs in two key points:
a) it has been tested as an Elo-gainer against master;
b) the values output by the search are not changed on average by the implementation
(in other words, the optimism value changes the tension/exchange strategy, but a
displayed value of 1.0 pawn has the same signification before and after the patch).
See the old comment https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/1361#issuecomment-359165141
for some images illustrating the ideas.
-------
finished yellow at STC:
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 165048 W: 41705 L: 41611 D: 81732
Ptnml(0-2): 565, 18959, 43245, 19327, 428
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61942a3dcd645dc8291c876b
passed LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 121656 W: 30762 L: 30287 D: 60607
Ptnml(0-2): 87, 12558, 35032, 13095, 56
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61962c58cd645dc8291c8877
-------
How to continue from there?
a) the shape (slope and amplitude) of the sigmoid used to compute the optimism value
could be tweaked to try to gain more Elo, so the parameters of the sigmoid function
in line 391 of search.cpp could be tuned with SPSA. Manual tweaking is also possible
using this Desmos page: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/jhh83sqq92
b) in a similar vein, with two recents patches affecting the scaling of the NNUE
evaluation in evaluate.cpp, now could be a good time to try a round of SPSA tuning
of the NNUE network;
c) this patch will tend to keep tension in middlegame a little bit longer, so any
patch improving the defensive aspect of play via search extensions in risky,
tactical positions would be welcome.
-------
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3797
Bench: 6184852
Starting with Windows Build 20348 the behavior of the numa API has been changed:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/procthread/numa-support
Old code only worked because there was probably a limit on how many
cores/threads can reside within one NUMA node, and the OS creates extra NUMA
nodes when necessary, however the actual mechanism of core binding is
done by "Processor Groups"(https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/procthread/processor-groups). With a newer OS, one NUMA node can have many
such "Processor Groups" and we should just consistently use the number
of groups to bind the threads instead of deriving the topology from
the number of NUMA nodes.
This change is required to spread threads on all cores on Windows 11 with
a 3990X CPU. It has only 1 NUMA node with 2 groups of 64 threads each.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3787
No functional change.
In case the evaluation at root is large, discourage the use of lazyEval.
This fixes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/issues/3772
or at least improves it significantly. In this case, poor play with large
odds can be observed, in extreme cases leading to a loss despite large
advantage:
r1bq1b1r/ppp3p1/3p1nkp/n3p3/2B1P2N/2NPB3/PPP2PPP/R3K2R b KQ - 5 9
With this patch the poor move is only considered up to depth 13, in master
up to depth 28.
The patch did not pass at LTC with Elo gainer bounds, but with slightly
positive Elo nevertheless (95% LOS).
STC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 40368 W: 10318 L: 10041 D: 20009
Ptnml(0-2): 103, 4493, 10725, 4750, 113
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61800ad259e71df00dcc420d
LTC:
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 212288 W: 52997 L: 52692 D: 106599
Ptnml(0-2): 112, 22038, 61549, 22323, 122
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/618050d959e71df00dcc426d
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3780
Bench: 7127040
Maintain for each root move an exponential average of the search value with a weight ratio of 2:1 (new value vs old values). Then the average score is used as the center of the initial aspiration window instead of the previous score.
Stats indicate (see PR) that the deviation for previous score is in general greater than using average score, so later seems a better estimation of the next search value. This is probably the reason this patch succeded besides smoothing the sometimes wild swings in search score. An additional observation is that at higher depth previous score is above but average score below zero. So for average score more/less fail/low highs should be occur than previous score.
STC:
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 59792 W: 15106 L: 14792 D: 29894
Ptnml(0-2): 144, 6718, 15869, 7010, 155
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61841612d7a085ad008eef06
LTC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 46448 W: 11835 L: 11537 D: 23076
Ptnml(0-2): 21, 4756, 13374, 5050, 23
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/618463abd7a085ad008eef3e
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3776
Bench: 6719976
Currently we handle the UCI_Elo with a double randomization. This
seems not necessary and a bit involuted.
This patch removes the first randomization and unifies the 2 cases.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3769
No functional change.
To help with debugging, the worker sends the output of
stderr (suitable truncated) to the action log on the
server, in case a build fails. For this to work it is
important that there is no spurious output to stderr.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3773
No functional change
Official release version of Stockfish 14.1
Bench: 6334068
---
Today, we have the pleasure to announce Stockfish 14.1.
As usual, downloads will be freely available at stockfishchess.org/download [1].
With Stockfish 14.1 our users get access to the strongest chess engine
available today. In the period leading up to this release, Stockfish
convincingly won several chess engine tournaments, including the TCEC 21
superfinal, the TCEC Cup 9, and the Computer Chess Championship for
Fischer Random Chess (Chess960). In the latter tournament, Stockfish
was undefeated in 599 out of 600 games played.
Compared to Stockfish 14, this release introduces a more advanced NNUE
architecture and various search improvements. In self play testing, using
a book of balanced openings, Stockfish 14.1 wins three times more game
pairs than it loses [2]. At this high level, draws are very common, so the
Elo difference to Stockfish 14 is about 17 Elo. The NNUE evaluation method,
introduced to top level chess with Stockfish 12 about one year ago [3],
has now been adopted by several other strong CPU based chess engines.
The Stockfish project builds on a thriving community of enthusiasts
(thanks everybody!) that contribute their expertise, time, and resources
to build a free and open-source chess engine that is robust,
widely available, and very strong. We invite our chess fans to join the
fishtest testing framework and programmers to contribute to the project [4].
Stay safe and enjoy chess!
The Stockfish team
[1] https://stockfishchess.org/download/
[2] https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6175c320af70c2be1788fa2b
[3] https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/discussions/3628
[4] https://stockfishchess.org/get-involved/
Idea of this patch is the following: in case we already have four moves that
exceeded alpha in the current node, the probability of finding fifth should
be reasonably low. Note that four is completely arbitrary - there could and
probably should be some tweaks, both in tweaking best move count threshold
for more reductions and tweaking how they work - for example making more
reductions with best move count linearly.
passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/615f614783dd501a05b0aee2
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 141816 W: 36056 L: 35686 D: 70074
Ptnml(0-2): 499, 15131, 39273, 15511, 494
passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/615fdff683dd501a05b0af35
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 68536 W: 17221 L: 16891 D: 34424
Ptnml(0-2): 38, 6573, 20725, 6885, 47
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3736
Bench: 6131513
This patch updates the stat_bonus() function (used in the history tables to
help move ordering), keeping the same quadratic for small depths but changing
the values for depth >= 9:
The old bonus formula was increasing from zero at depth 1 to 4100 at depth 14,
then used the strange, small value of 73 for all depths >= 15.
The new bonus formula increases from 0 at depth 1 to 2000 at depth 8, then
keeps 2000 for all depths >= 8.
passed STC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 169624 W: 42875 L: 42454 D: 84295
Ptnml(0-2): 585, 19340, 44557, 19729, 601
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/615bd69e9d256038a969b97c
passed LTC:
LLR: 3.07 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 37336 W: 9456 L: 9191 D: 18689
Ptnml(0-2): 20, 3810, 10747, 4067, 24
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/615c75d99d256038a969b9b2
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3731
Bench: 6261865
When playing games in MultiPV mode we must take care to only track the
best move changing for the first PV line. Otherwise, SF will spend most
of its time for the initial moves after the book exit.
This has been observed and reported on Discord, but can also be seen in
games played in Stefan Pohl's MultiPV experiment.
Tested with MultiPV=4.
STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/615c24b59d256038a969b990
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 1744 W: 694 L: 447 D: 603
Ptnml(0-2): 32, 125, 358, 278, 79
LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/615c31769d256038a969b993
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 2048 W: 723 L: 525 D: 800
Ptnml(0-2): 10, 158, 511, 314, 31
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3729
Bench: 5714575
Respin of multi-thread idea that was simplified away recently: basically doing
more reductions with thread count since Lazy SMP naturally widens search. With
drawish book this idea got simplified away but with less drawish book it again
gains elo, maybe trying to reinstall other ideas that were simplified away
previously can be beneficial.
passed STC
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 39736 W: 10205 L: 9986 D: 19545
Ptnml(0-2): 45, 4254, 11064, 4447, 58
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/615750702d02f48db3961b00
passed LTC
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 60352 W: 15530 L: 15218 D: 29604
Ptnml(0-2): 24, 5900, 18016, 6212, 24
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6157d8935488e26ea5eace7f
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3724
Bench 5714575
Idea is to extend some quiet ttMoves if a lot of things indicate that
the transposition table move is going to be a good move:
1) move being a killer - so being the best move in nearby node;
2) reply continuation history is really good.
This is basically saying that move is good "in general" in this position,
that it is a good reply to the opponent move and that it was the best in
this position somewhere in search - so extending it makes a lot of sense.
In general in past year we had a lot of extensions of different types,
maybe there is something more in it :)
passed STC
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 42944 W: 10932 L: 10695 D: 21317
Ptnml(0-2): 141, 4869, 11210, 5116, 136
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/614cca8e7bdc23e77ceb89f0
passed LTC
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 156848 W: 39473 L: 38893 D: 78482
Ptnml(0-2): 125, 16327, 44913, 16961, 98
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/614cf93d7bdc23e77ceb8a13
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3719
Bench: 5714575
In master, during singular move analysis, when both the transposition value
and a reduced search for the other moves seem to indicate a fail high, we
heuristically prune the whole subtree and return an fail high score.
This patch is a little bit more cautious in this case, and instead of the
risky cutoff, we now search the ttMove with a reduced depth (by two plies).
STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/614dafe07bdc23e77ceb8a89
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 46728 W: 11909 L: 11666 D: 23153
Ptnml(0-2): 181, 5288, 12168, 5561, 166
LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/614dc84abe4c07e0ecac3c95
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 74520 W: 18809 L: 18450 D: 37261
Ptnml(0-2): 45, 7735, 21346, 8084, 50
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3718
Bench: 5499262
This patch relax a little bit the condition for doubly singular moves
(ie moves that are so forced that we think that they deserve a local
double extension of the search). We lower the margin and allow up to
six such double extensions in the path between the root and the critical
node.
Original idea by Siad Daboul (@TopoIogist) in PR #3709
Tested with the previous commit:
passed STC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 33048 W: 8458 L: 8236 D: 16354
Ptnml(0-2): 120, 3701, 8660, 3923, 120
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/614b24347bdc23e77ceb88fe
passed LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 54176 W: 13712 L: 13406 D: 27058
Ptnml(0-2): 36, 5653, 15399, 5969, 31
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/614b3b727bdc23e77ceb8911
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3714
Bench: 5792377
This patch detects some search explosions (due to double extensions in
search.cpp) which can happen in some pathological positions, and takes
measures to ensure progress in search even for these pathological situations.
While a small number of double extensions can be useful during search
(for example to resolve a tactical sequence), a sustained regime of
double extensions leads to search explosion and a non-finishing search.
See the discussion in https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3544
and the issue https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/issues/3532 .
The implemented algorithm is the following:
a) at each node during search, store the current depth in the stack.
Double extensions are by definition levels of the stack where the
depth at ply N is strictly higher than depth at ply N-1.
b) during search, calculate for each thread a running average of the
number of double extensions in the last 4096 visited nodes.
c) if one thread has more than 2% of double extensions for a sustained
period of time (6 millions consecutive nodes, or about 4 seconds on
my iMac), we decide that this thread is in an explosion state and
we calm down this thread by preventing it to do any double extension
for the next 6 millions nodes.
To calculate the running averages, we also introduced a auxiliary class
generalizing the computations of ttHitAverage variable we already had in
code. The implementation uses an exponential moving average of period 4096
and resolution 1/1024, and all computations are done with integers for
efficiency.
-----------
Example where the patch solves a search explosion:
```
./stockfish
ucinewgame
position fen 8/Pk6/8/1p6/8/P1K5/8/6B1 w - - 37 130
go infinite
```
This algorithm does not affect search in normal, non-pathological positions.
We verified, for instance, that the usual bench is unchanged up to depth 20
at least, and that the node numbers are unchanged for a search of the starting
position at depth 32.
-------------
See https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3714
Bench: 5575265
This patch introduces extension for captures and promotions. Every capture or
promotion that is not the first move in the list gets extended at PvNodes and
cutNodes. Special thanks to @locutus2 - all my previous attepmts that failed
on this idea were done only for PvNodes - idea to include also cutNodes was
based on his latest passed patch.
STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6134abf325b9b35584838574
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 188920 W: 47754 L: 47304 D: 93862
Ptnml(0-2): 595, 21754, 49344, 22140, 627
LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/613521de25b9b355848385d7
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 8768 W: 2283 L: 2098 D: 4387
Ptnml(0-2): 7, 866, 2452, 1053, 6
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3692
bench: 5564555
The new network caused some issues initially due to the very narrow neuron set between the first two FC layers. Necessary changes were hacked together to make it work. This patch is a mature approach to make the affine transform code faster, more readable, and easier to maintain should the layer sizes change again.
The following changes were made:
* ClippedReLU always produces a multiple of 32 outputs. This is about as good of a solution for AffineTransform's SIMD requirements as it can get without a bigger rewrite.
* All self-contained simd helpers are moved to a separate file (simd.h). Inline asm is utilized to work around GCC's issues with code generation and register assignment. See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101693, https://godbolt.org/z/da76fY1n7
* AffineTransform has 2 specializations. While it's more lines of code due to the boilerplate, the logic in both is significantly reduced, as these two are impossible to nicely combine into one.
1) The first specialization is for cases when there's >=128 inputs. It uses a different approach to perform the affine transform and can make full use of AVX512 without any edge cases. Furthermore, it has higher theoretical throughput because less loads are needed in the hot path, requiring only a fixed amount of instructions for horizontal additions at the end, which are amortized by the large number of inputs.
2) The second specialization is made to handle smaller layers where performance is still necessary but edge cases need to be handled. AVX512 implementation for this was ommited by mistake, a remnant from the temporary implementation for the new... This could be easily reintroduced if needed. A slightly more detailed description of both implementations is in the code.
Overall it should be a minor speedup, as shown on fishtest:
passed STC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 51520 W: 4074 L: 3888 D: 43558
Ptnml(0-2): 111, 3136, 19097, 3288, 128
and various tests shown in the pull request
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3663
No functional change
Introduces a new NNUE network architecture and associated network parameters
The summary of the changes:
* Position for each perspective mirrored such that the king is on e..h files. Cuts the feature transformer size in half, while preserving enough knowledge to be good. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gTlrr02qSNKiXNZ_SuO4-RjK4MXBiFlLE6jvNqqMkAY/edit#heading=h.b40q4rb1w7on.
* The number of neurons after the feature transformer increased two-fold, to 1024x2. This is possibly mostly due to the now very optimized feature transformer update code.
* The number of neurons after the second layer is reduced from 16 to 8, to reduce the speed impact. This, perhaps surprisingly, doesn't harm the strength much. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gTlrr02qSNKiXNZ_SuO4-RjK4MXBiFlLE6jvNqqMkAY/edit#heading=h.6qkocr97fezq
The AffineTransform code did not work out-of-the box with the smaller number of neurons after the second layer, so some temporary changes have been made to add a special case for InputDimensions == 8. Also additional 0 padding is added to the output for some archs that cannot process inputs by <=8 (SSE2, NEON). VNNI uses an implementation that can keep all outputs in the registers while reducing the number of loads by 3 for each 16 inputs, thanks to the reduced number of output neurons. However GCC is particularily bad at optimization here (and perhaps why the current way the affine transform is done even passed sprt) (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gTlrr02qSNKiXNZ_SuO4-RjK4MXBiFlLE6jvNqqMkAY/edit# for details) and more work will be done on this in the following days. I expect the current VNNI implementation to be improved and extended to other architectures.
The network was trained with a slightly modified version of the pytorch trainer (https://github.com/glinscott/nnue-pytorch); the changes are in https://github.com/glinscott/nnue-pytorch/pull/143
The training utilized 2 datasets.
dataset A - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VlhnHL8f-20AXhGkILujnNXHwy9T-MQw/view?usp=sharing
dataset B - as described in https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/commit/ba01f4b95448bcb324755f4dd2a632a57c6e67bc
The training process was as following:
train on dataset A for 350 epochs, take the best net in terms of elo at 20k nodes per move (it's fine to take anything from later stages of training).
convert the .ckpt to .pt
--resume-from-model from the .pt file, train on dataset B for <600 epochs, take the best net. Lambda=0.8, applied before the loss function.
The first training command:
python3 train.py \
../nnue-pytorch-training/data/large_gensfen_multipvdiff_100_d9.binpack \
../nnue-pytorch-training/data/large_gensfen_multipvdiff_100_d9.binpack \
--gpus "$3," \
--threads 1 \
--num-workers 1 \
--batch-size 16384 \
--progress_bar_refresh_rate 20 \
--smart-fen-skipping \
--random-fen-skipping 3 \
--features=HalfKAv2_hm^ \
--lambda=1.0 \
--max_epochs=600 \
--default_root_dir ../nnue-pytorch-training/experiment_$1/run_$2
The second training command:
python3 serialize.py \
--features=HalfKAv2_hm^ \
../nnue-pytorch-training/experiment_131/run_6/default/version_0/checkpoints/epoch-499.ckpt \
../nnue-pytorch-training/experiment_$1/base/base.pt
python3 train.py \
../nnue-pytorch-training/data/michael_commit_b94a65.binpack \
../nnue-pytorch-training/data/michael_commit_b94a65.binpack \
--gpus "$3," \
--threads 1 \
--num-workers 1 \
--batch-size 16384 \
--progress_bar_refresh_rate 20 \
--smart-fen-skipping \
--random-fen-skipping 3 \
--features=HalfKAv2_hm^ \
--lambda=0.8 \
--max_epochs=600 \
--resume-from-model ../nnue-pytorch-training/experiment_$1/base/base.pt \
--default_root_dir ../nnue-pytorch-training/experiment_$1/run_$2
STC: https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/611120b32a8a49ac5be798c4
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 22480 W: 2434 L: 2251 D: 17795
Ptnml(0-2): 101, 1736, 7410, 1865, 128
LTC: https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/611152b32a8a49ac5be798ea
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 9776 W: 442 L: 333 D: 9001
Ptnml(0-2): 5, 295, 4180, 402, 6
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3646
bench: 5189338
This patch improves the codegen in the AffineTransform::forward function for architectures >=SSSE3. Current code works directly on memory and the compiler cannot see that the stores through outptr do not alias the loads through weights and input32. The solution implemented is to perform the affine transform with local variables as accumulators and only store the result to memory at the end. The number of accumulators required is OutputDimensions / OutputSimdWidth, which means that for the 1024->16 affine transform it requires 4 registers with SSSE3, 2 with AVX2, 1 with AVX512. It also cuts the number of stores required by NumRegs * 256 for each node evaluated. The local accumulators are expected to be assigned to registers, but even if this cannot be done in some case due to register pressure it will help the compiler to see that there is no aliasing between the loads and stores and may still result in better codegen.
See https://godbolt.org/z/59aTKbbYc for codegen comparison.
passed STC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 140328 W: 10635 L: 10358 D: 119335
Ptnml(0-2): 302, 8339, 52636, 8554, 333
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3634
No functional change
combined work by Serio Vieri, Michael Byrne, and Jonathan D (aka SFisGod) based on top of previous developments, by restarts from good nets.
Sergio generated the net https://tests.stockfishchess.org/api/nn/nn-d8609abe8caf.nnue:
The initial net nn-d8609abe8caf.nnue is trained by generating around 16B of training data from the last master net nn-9e3c6298299a.nnue, then trained, continuing from the master net, with lambda=0.2 and sampling ratio of 1. Starting with LR=2e-3, dropping LR with a factor of 0.5 until it reaches LR=5e-4. in_scaling is set to 361. No other significant changes made to the pytorch trainer.
Training data gen command (generates in chunks of 200k positions):
generate_training_data min_depth 9 max_depth 11 count 200000 random_move_count 10 random_move_max_ply 80 random_multi_pv 12 random_multi_pv_diff 100 random_multi_pv_depth 8 write_min_ply 10 eval_limit 1500 book noob_3moves.epd output_file_name gendata/$(date +"%Y%m%d-%H%M")_${HOSTNAME}.binpack
PyTorch trainer command (Note that this only trains for 20 epochs, repeatedly train until convergence):
python train.py --features "HalfKAv2^" --max_epochs 20 --smart-fen-skipping --random-fen-skipping 500 --batch-size 8192 --default_root_dir $dir --seed $RANDOM --threads 4 --num-workers 32 --gpus $gpuids --track_grad_norm 2 --gradient_clip_val 0.05 --lambda 0.2 --log_every_n_steps 50 $resumeopt $data $val
See https://github.com/sergiovieri/Stockfish/tree/tools_mod/rl for the scripts used to generate data.
Based on that Michael generated nn-76a8a7ffb820.nnue in the following way:
The net being submitted was trained with the pytorch trainer: https://github.com/glinscott/nnue-pytorch
python train.py i:/bin/all.binpack i:/bin/all.binpack --gpus 1 --threads 4 --num-workers 30 --batch-size 16384 --progress_bar_refresh_rate 30 --smart-fen-skipping --random-fen-skipping 3 --features=HalfKAv2^ --auto_lr_find True --lambda=1.0 --max_epochs=240 --seed %random%%random% --default_root_dir exp/run_109 --resume-from-model ./pt/nn-d8609abe8caf.pt
This run is thus started from Segio Vieri's net nn-d8609abe8caf.nnue
all.binpack equaled 4 parts Wrong_NNUE_2.binpack https://drive.google.com/file/d/1seGNOqcVdvK_vPNq98j-zV3XPE5zWAeq/view?usp=sharing plus two parts of Training_Data.binpack https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RFkQES3DpsiJqsOtUshENtzPfFgUmEff/view?usp=sharing
Each set was concatenated together - making one large Wrong_NNUE 2 binpack and one large Training so the were approximately equal in size. They were then interleaved together. The idea was to give Wrong_NNUE.binpack closer to equal weighting with the Training_Data binpack
model.py modifications:
loss = torch.pow(torch.abs(p - q), 2.6).mean()
LR = 8.0e-5 calculated as follows: 1.5e-3*(.992^360) - the idea here was to take a highly trained net and just use all.binpack as a finishing micro refinement touch for the last 2 Elo or so. This net was discovered on the 59th epoch.
optimizer = ranger.Ranger(train_params, betas=(.90, 0.999), eps=1.0e-7, gc_loc=False, use_gc=False)
scheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.StepLR(optimizer, step_size=1, gamma=0.992)
For this micro optimization, I had set the period to "5" in train.py. This changes the checkpoint output so that every 5th checkpoint file is created
The final touches were to adjust the NNUE scale, as was done by Jonathan in tests running at the same time.
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60fa45aed8a6b65b2f3a77a4
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 53040 W: 1732 L: 1575 D: 49733
Ptnml(0-2): 14, 1432, 23474, 1583, 17
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60f9fee2d8a6b65b2f3a7775
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 37928 W: 3178 L: 3001 D: 31749
Ptnml(0-2): 100, 2446, 13695, 2623, 100.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3626
Bench: 5169957
The main idea is that illegal moves influencing search or
qsearch obviously can't be any sort of good. The only reason
why initially legality checks for search and qsearch were done
after they actually can influence some heuristics is because
legality check is expensive computationally. Eventually in
search it was moved to the place where it makes sure that
illegal moves can't influence search.
This patch shows that the same can be done for qsearch + it
passed STC with elo-gaining bounds + it removes 3 lines of code
because one no longer needs to increment/decrement movecount
on illegal moves.
passed STC with elo-gaining bounds
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60f20aefd1189bed71812da0
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 61512 W: 4688 L: 4492 D: 52332
Ptnml(0-2): 139, 3730, 22848, 3874, 165
The same version functionally but with moving condition ever earlier
passed LTC with simplification bounds.
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60f292cad1189bed71812de9
LLR: 2.98 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.50,0.50>
Total: 60944 W: 1724 L: 1685 D: 57535
Ptnml(0-2): 11, 1556, 27298, 1597, 10
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3618
bench 4709569
Not all linux users will have libatomic installed.
When using clang as the system compiler with compiler-rt as the default
runtime library instead of libgcc, atomic builtins may be provided by compiler-rt.
This change allows such users to pass RTLIB=compiler-rt to make sure
the build doesn't error out on the missing (unnecessary) libatomic.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3597
No functional change
* [Copying.txt](https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/blob/master/Copying.txt), a text file containing the GNU General Public License version 3.
# to increase the likelyhood of finding a non-reproducible case,
# to increase the likelihood of finding a non-reproducible case,
# the allowed number of nodes are varied systematically
for i in `seq 1 20`
do
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
