[STC](https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/live_elo/69cb991bc025c305b7daa219)
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 47520 W: 12558 L: 12219 D: 22743
Ptnml(0-2): 190, 5474, 12102, 5795, 199
[LTC](https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/live_elo/69cc6b42731dfb72d2e92128)
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 123756 W: 31996 L: 31497 D: 60263
Ptnml(0-2): 81, 13512, 34221, 13955, 109
Adds features for pawns pushing against other pawns. For indexing, we
use the existing threats feature set by adding the forward square to the
squares threatened by a pawn. This threat is only enabled when another
pawn occupies that square. We then add appropriate logic changes in
`update_piece_threats` and `features/full_threats.cpp`.
The wonderful Ciekce (of Stormphrax) and peregrine (of Reckless) also
had similar ideas with adding forward pawn movements to TI, and I
appreciate their giving me motivation to figure out `nnue-pytorch` and
test it.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6694
Bench: 2926703
Passed non-regression STC at
tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/69c9b8c3a54395a761335044 (set to
gainer bounds, *mea culpa*)
There's a major performance penalty when compiling the fish with GCC 16.
@Torom 's measurements (similar to mine, but more precise):
```
GCC 15 (master) vs. 16 (master)
sf_base = 2549174 +/- 2984 (95%)
sf_test = 2435456 +/- 2239 (95%)
diff = -113718 +/- 3599 (95%)
speedup = -4.46100% +/- 0.141% (95%)
GCC 15 (master) vs. 16 (patch)
sf_base = 2544107 +/- 3091 (95%)
sf_test = 2568837 +/- 3164 (95%)
diff = 24729 +/- 4359 (95%)
speedup = 0.97204% +/- 0.171% (95%)
```
Based on looking at the disassembly + profiling data of the builds, the
root cause appears to be overly aggressive code duplication from
constant propagation of various functions especially in `search.cpp`.
The worst offender is `Worker::search`, which I think is being cloned
and optimized based on the value of `cutNode`. `perf stat` indicates
that the instruction cache miss rate goes up by ~50% on the GCC 16
build.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6691
No functional change
Passed simp STC
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 29632 W: 7772 L: 7552 D: 14308
Ptnml(0-2): 76, 3155, 8147, 3349,
Id expect there to be a small speedup (bc the compiler can skip some
stores) but i haven’t tried to measure it
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6688
No functional change
STC
```
LLR: 5.45 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 612192 W: 158602 L: 157260 D: 296330
Ptnml(0-2): 1634, 67783, 166027, 68911, 1741
```
@Torom measured:
```
sf_base = 2380902 +/- 1016 (95%)
sf_test = 2391426 +/- 1065 (95%)
diff = 10524 +/- 1336 (95%)
speedup = 0.44203% +/- 0.056% (95%)
```
I've verified that `_mm512_slli_epi16(v, 0)` gets optimized out in GCC
9+ and clang 4+. Added constants to types.h so that people messing
around with the layout of `Move` don't have to know about this part of
the code.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6670
No functional change
Thanks to MinetaS for discovering this and finding the culprit commit,
specific to this architecture. 9f42980 was subtly incorrect, leading to
spurious wrong benches on avx512icl. Because this piece of code has twice been
the source of wrong benches, I also added a brief comment explaining why it
needs to be this way, and added a sample position to bench.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6654
Bench: 2288704
some environment dependent execution (e.g. pid) were being std::hash'ed, and
net filenames put in unordered maps. Also uses sprintf instead of
std::to_string. Depending on precise content, this could lead to different
PGO'ed binaries. This is mitigated by using a basic hash function.
This also fixes a potential issue in net filename generation, in cases where
std::hash would use invocation dependent salt, which is not the cases today for
typical std libraries.
Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6562
No functional change
With the current setup, on Linux, SIGILL (and SIGSEGV/SIGBUS etc., in the case
of a program bug) lead to no feedback if they occur after the signal handlers
are installed, they just exit silently. By invoking the default signal handler,
we can still get the appropriate feedback. This is particularly important for
feedback if someone downloads the wrong SF binary and runs it on Linux.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6554
No functional change
avoid munmap of memory when exiting via signal, which avoids side effects such
as triggering asserts or (caught) segfaults while the process exists.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6542
No functional change
Windows 10 is missing the GroupMasks and GroupCount members, this breaks compiles on Windows 10.
Windows 11 builds, including the official ones, run fine on Windows 10/11.
To support developers/testers on Windows 10, fallback conditionally to the Windows 10 struct definition.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6538
No functional change
Although shared history has been successful overall, it led to some speed
issues with large numbers of threads. Originally we just split by NUMA node,
but on systems with non-unified L3 caches (most AMD workstation and server
CPUs, and some Intel E-core based server CPUs), this can still lead to a speed
penalty at the default config. Thus, we decided to further subdivide the shared
history based on the L3 cache structure.
Based on this test, the original SPRTs, and speed experiments, we decided that
grouping L3 domains to reach 32 threads per SharedHistories was a reasonable
balance for affected systems – but we may revisit this in the future. See the
PR for full details.
In an extreme case, a single-socket EPYC 9755 configured with 1 numa domain per socket,
the nps increases from:
Nodes/second : 182827480
to
Nodes/second : 229118365
In many cases, when L3 caches are shared between many threads, or when several
numa nodes are already configured per socket, this patch does not influence the
default. This default setting can adjusted with the existing NumaPolicy option.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6526
No functional change.
[Passed STC SMP](https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/694e506c572093c1986d7276):
```
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 14992 W: 3924 L: 3653 D: 7415
Ptnml(0-2): 20, 1547, 4090, 1820, 19
```
[Passed LTC SMP](https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/live_elo/694ead61572093c1986d7365):
```
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 41146 W: 10654 L: 10342 D: 20150
Ptnml(0-2): 17, 3999, 12225, 4319, 13
```
[Passed a sanity check STC SMP post-refactoring](https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/69503997572093c1986d763a):
```
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 46728 W: 12178 L: 11863 D: 22687
Ptnml(0-2): 82, 5093, 12685, 5436, 68
```
(The large gain of the first STC was probably a fluke, and this result
is more reasonable!)
After shared correction history, Viz suggested we try sharing other
histories, especially `pawnHistory`. As far as we're aware, sharing
history besides correction history (like Caissa does) is novel. The
implementation follows the same pattern as shared correction history –
the size of the history table is scaled with
`next_power_of_two(threadsInNumaNode)` and the entry is prefetched in
`do_move`.
A bit of refactoring was done to accommodate this new history. Note that
we prefetch `&history->pawn_entry(*this)[pc][to]` rather than
`&history->pawn_entry(*this)` because unlike the other entries, each
entry contains multiple cache lines.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6498
Bench: 2503391
Co-authored-by: Michael Chaly <Vizvezdenec@gmail.com>
We did quite a few tests because this is a pretty involved change with
unknown scaling behavior, but results are decent.
[STC 10+0.1 1th, non-regression](https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/live_elo/6941ce3b46f342e1ec210180)
```
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 83200 W: 21615 L: 21452 D: 40133
Ptnml(0-2): 247, 9064, 22844, 9169, 276
```
[STC 5+0.05 8th](https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/live_elo/693dc38346f342e1ec20f555)
```
LLR: 3.48 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 58536 W: 15067 L: 14688 D: 28781
Ptnml(0-2): 87, 6474, 15781, 6825, 101
```
[LTC 20+0.2 8th](https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/live_elo/693f2afb46f342e1ec20f847)
```
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 27716 W: 7211 L: 6925 D: 13580
Ptnml(0-2): 8, 2674, 8207, 2962, 7
```
[LTC 10+0.1 64th](https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/live_elo/694003aa46f342e1ec20fac4):
```
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 16918 W: 4439 L: 4182 D: 8297
Ptnml(0-2): 3, 1493, 5213, 1744, 6
```
[NUMA test, 5+0.05 256th](https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6941ee4e46f342e1ec210203)
```
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 7124 W: 1910 L: 1678 D: 3536
Ptnml(0-2): 0, 560, 2211, 790, 1
```
[LTC 60+0.6 64th](https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/live_elo/6940a85346f342e1ec20fcde):
```
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 15504 W: 4045 L: 3826 D: 7633
Ptnml(0-2): 0, 1002, 5530, 1219, 1
```
Bonus (courtesy of Viz): The 1 double kill in this last test was master
blundering a cool mate in 3: https://lichess.org/jyNZuRl4
Basically the idea here is to share correction history between threads.
That way, T1 can use the correction values produced by T2, which already
searched positions with that pawn structure etc., so that T1 can search
more efficiently. The table size per thread is about the same, so we
shouldn't get a large increase in hash collisions; in fact, I'd expect a
lower collision rate overall.
Although I came up with and implemented the idea independently,
[Caissa](https://github.com/Witek902/Caissa) was the first engine to
implement corrhist sharing (and corrhist in the first place) – this idea
is not completely novel.
The table size is rounded to a power of two. In particular, it's `65536
* nextPowerOfTwo(threadCount)`. That way, the indexing operation becomes
an AND of the key bits with a mask, rather than something more expensive
(e.g., a `mul_hi64`-style approach or a modulo).
The updates are racy, like the TT, but because `entry` is hoisted into a
register, there's no risk of writing back a value that's out of the
designated range `[-D, D]`. Various attempts at rewriting using atomics
led to substantial slowdowns, so we begrudgingly ignored the functions
in thread sanitizer, but at some point we'd like to make this better.
We allocate one shared correction history per NUMA node, because the
penalty associated with crossing nodes is substantial – I get a 40% hit
with NPS=4 and 256 threads, which is intolerable. With separate tables
per NUMA node I get a 6% penalty for nodes per second, which isn't ideal
but apparently compensated for.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6478
Bench: 2690604
Co-authored-by: Disservin <disservin.social@gmail.com>
```
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 92736 W: 24149 L: 23764 D: 44823
Ptnml(0-2): 280, 10056, 25334, 10395, 303
```
The use of `IndexType` in the loops is suboptimal because it requires
truncation to 32 bits, and thereby defeats some optimizations. Using
`size_t` for the loop body works nicely, and a signed index into the
index lists allows the compiler to assume the case `added.size() ==
UINT_MAX`, which would be an infinite loop, to not happen.
Passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/live_elo/692fd98ab23dfeae38d01d98
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6466
No functional change
Remove a couple unused things, mark `noRaysContaining` as
`[[maybe_unused]]` (suggested by Viz) to silence a warning on GCC 10,
update a comment, and replace inline constants
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6460
No functional change
passed on avx512ICL:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 30240 W: 8026 L: 7726 D: 14488
Ptnml(0-2): 95, 3235, 8171, 3513, 106
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/69281d9ab23dfeae38cfeeb8
passed on generic architectures:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 73184 W: 19183 L: 18821 D: 35180
Ptnml(0-2): 258, 7988, 19744, 8338, 264
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6928ba11b23dfeae38cff276
subsequent cleanups tested as:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 72480 W: 18678 L: 18502 D: 35300
Ptnml(0-2): 242, 7925, 19718, 8125, 230
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/692a26adb23dfeae38cff566
We add an argument noRaysContaining, which skips all discoveries which contain
all bits in the argument; if the argument is from | to, then this will
eliminate the discovery. Separately, on AVX512ICL we can speed up the
computation of DirtyThreats by moving from a pop_lsb loop to a vector
extraction with vpcompressb. See PR for details.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6453
No functional change
fetch_add and friends must produce a locking instruction because they guarantee
consistency in the presence of multiple writers. Because only one thread ever
writes to nodes and tbHits, we may use relaxed load and store to emit regular
loads and stores (on both x86-64 and arm64), while avoiding undefined behavior
and miscounting nodes.
Credit must go to Arseniy Surkov of Reckless (codedeliveryservice) for
uncovering this performance gotcha.
failed yellow as a gainer on fishtest:
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 219616 W: 57165 L: 57105 D: 105346
Ptnml(0-2): 732, 24277, 59720, 24357, 722
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/69086abfea4b268f1fac2809
potential small speedup on large core system:
```
==== master ====
1 Nodes/second : 294269736
2 Nodes/second : 295217629
Average (over 2): 294743682
==== patch ====
1 Nodes/second : 299003603
2 Nodes/second : 298111320
Average (over 2): 298557461
```
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6392
No functional change
During recent work on threat inputs, there was a hard-to-debug crash in tbprobe
caused by incorrectly computing st->materialKey. This PR adds correctness
checking to pos_is_ok and a faster check in tbprobe that will actually run in
CI (because pos_is_ok checking is disabled even in debug mode, for performance
purposes).
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6410
No functional change
The contents of DirtyThreats gets memcpyed twice for each call to do_move.
(Return value optimization doesn't apply to the do_move function itself because
it constructs a std::pair, so it gets copied; and the calls to reset also
require a copy.) This patch inserts the dirty info in place.
Sometimes the caller of do_move ignores the DirtyThreats info, so we pass in
scratch objects. I found that stack-allocating these scratch objects was bad on
Fishtest, so I begrudgingly put them in the Position struct. Both templating
the do_move function on whether dirty threats are needed and putting a
null-check branch for each use of dirty threats were slowdowns locally. Of
course, nothing prevents a future attempt at cleaning this up.
passed STC
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 68448 W: 17770 L: 17418 D: 33260
Ptnml(0-2): 198, 7425, 18630, 7769, 202
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6914c01a7ca87818523318ba
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6414
No functional change
The speedup seems to vary by machine. The indexing function can be changed w/o needing to understand intrinsics.
Result of 100 runs
==================
base (...ish_baseline) = 1719637 +/- 3233
test (./stockfish ) = 1734245 +/- 3534
diff = +14608 +/- 4868
speedup = +0.0085
P(speedup > 0) = 1.0000
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6366
No functional change
Only a modest amount of work happens between the transposition table prefetch
and the probe, so the probe still often stalls waiting for DRAM. The vast
majority of the time (in particular, if !checkEP), the key is known much
earlier in the do_move function and the latency can be better hidden.
passed STC SMP
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/68f337c528e6d77fcffa066a
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 65256 W: 16806 L: 16462 D: 31988
Ptnml(0-2): 76, 7386, 17362, 7726, 78
but failed to gain STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/68f3378328e6d77fcffa0665
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 109824 W: 28523 L: 28618 D: 52683
Ptnml(0-2): 311, 11799, 30788, 11702, 312
In local tests, the speedup grows with thread count
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6372
No functional change
On x86, GCC generates highly suboptimal code for this loop in its old form,
about 2x as many instructions as necessary. This decreases throughput
especially in an SMT setting. Clang does a better job but this change still has
some improvement. Note that the std::ptrdiff_t type is not optional; using an
unsigned type brings back the bad assembly. (Not sure why, but it seems
reliable on all the GCC versions I tested.)
passed STC:
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 44672 W: 11841 L: 11527 D: 21304
Ptnml(0-2): 165, 4625, 12415, 4993, 138
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/68d8111efa806e2e8393b10e
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6331
No functional change
